• @Lodespawn@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Wasn’t this already debunked as a poor replacement for pumped storage hydro electric? The blocks and the things moving them will always have more wear than water and turbines.

    • @SheenSquelcher@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 days ago

      Recycling lithium ion batteries isn’t easy either though, and you might not have the geography for hydro.

      • @Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 days ago

        I believe the argument against solid block gravity batteries is that you can achieve the same thing with water by using old mines or even just digging a 40story hole. If you have room for the 40 story tower then you have room for a more efficient pumped hydro hole.

      • @SheenSquelcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 days ago

        The article mentions using greener things like waste and soil.

        And if you were using redundant mine shaft thats greener than building new structures.

  • @pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 days ago

    It’s not really a battery killer at all. It would never fit or be useful in a car, phone or anything portable. It’s more of a possible replacement to pumped-storage hydroelectric.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      612 days ago

      Batteries are increasingly used for large scale storage now, especially with renewables becoming more prevalent.