But that-

ONCE AND FOR ALL!

  • deejay4am
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Just one small problem, Ben. Where’s the heat from the condenser going to go?! FUCKING AQUAMAN?!?

    • finder
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      We are going to bottle the heat and return it to the sun!

    • @scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I think the purpose isn’t to directly cool the planet, but the ice has much higher reflectivity and absorbs less heat from the sun compared to the ocean.

      If this thing can produce ice at a large enough scale, it could have a real effect. However that doesn’t solve the issue of those gaseous dudes beating up the escaping heat men and trapping them in.

    • Froyn
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      We package it and send it to the moon. It’s cold on the moon.

  • jpj007
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    Just like Daddy puts in his drink every night.

    And then he gets mad.

  • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Solving climate change with a digital tech demo hosted on a GoFundMe page is a worse idea than even comedy writers could come up with

    • @krackalot@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I’m guessing the goal is to convince a few people on the edge that we’ve already solved it, so they care less. Slowing down the movements progress ever so slightly.

  • VoxAdActa
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    This sounds like one of those ideas on the level of “If we punch another hole in the ozone layer, the greenhouse gasses can escape!”

  • gerowen
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    I wonder if they realize that, according to the laws of physics and thermodynamics, the amount of heat and energy they consume and put into the world in order to produce those ice blocks, actually exceeds the amount they’re removing. So making ice blocks might help in the short term, but in the long term, they might actually make it worse, if not for the arctic, than for other places on the planet. Unless they’re doing other stuff like planting trees, the best they could ever hope for is to simply break even; to cancel themselves out.

    • BasicTraveler
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      The ice isn’t to cool the water, the ice is to reflect most of the incoming light.

      Sea ice keeps the polar regions cool and helps moderate global climate. Sea ice has a much brighter surface compared to many other Earth surfaces, particularly the surrounding ocean. The darker ocean reflects only 6 percent of the sun’s energy and absorbs the rest, while sea ice reflects 50 to 70 percent of the incoming energy.

      -- https://nsidc.org/learn/parts-cryosphere/sea-ice/quick-facts-about-sea-ice

      • PhineaZ
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Thank you very much, i was looking for this comment. The issue with 1°, 1.5°, 2° C of warming is that at some point you will break a critical level where the process is greatly accelerated because less/no sunlight is reflected by the ice caps, further increasing the energy absorption. This is especially apparent in Greenland and the Alps (and probably other glaciers), where the uncovered earth now absorbs WAY more light than the sheets of ice did, thus essentially making the melting process irreversible (at least in our comprehension).

      • Invalid
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        I suppose but if you are reflecting it into greenhouse gases then the air temperatures go up instead.

        • BasicTraveler
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Not really. Greenhouse gases don’t absorb all wavelengths of light. Generally they only absorb parts of the IR spectrum. The 50-70% of light reflected isn’t absorbed by greenhouse gasses because it’s not in a wavelength that it can absorb, it mostly radiates back into space.

          • Invalid
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Ah, and much of that energy would be absorbed on the way in. So the additional energy absorbed on the way out depends on how the surface material changes the reflected light or later radiates the absorbed energy.

    • Invalid
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      The site says it’s an architecture journal so…

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Could it be that the change in reflectivity compensates that?

    • Flaky_Fish69
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      you’d have to source the ice from someplace cold. Like drop a comet on the pole or something.

  • @SuperSloth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    I think letting freon leak into the atmosphere was actually reversing global warming so Big Air Conditioner started making up lies about “CFCs”.

  • 2d
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Saw a study recently that placed refrigeration management as one of the most impactful things regarding climate change… pretty sure that doing it on a big scale is a horrible idea

    • Invalid
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      No, it’s not possible unless the heat is being transferred outside of Earth and that requires a ton of energy. Also Kyle Hill did a video where he did the math and the cube required would be over 30 km^3

      • rocketpoweredredneck
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Oh, so I could just make a bunch of ice cubes in my fridge and throw them in the ocean! It would only take me the rest of life to make one of these at home!

  • @Kowowow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    ooh I wanted to make something like this but use a hyper-reflective surface(that sends IR rays into space causing a net heat loss) to cool the water, I was more planning for it to be in warmer waters and “push” the water though a heat sink using tesla valves but those might not have been needed