I’m pretty sure you’ve confused H2G2 with The Marching Martians
Mainly on @Aatube@kbin.melroy.org . This account to moderate subs while providing actual reasons for deletion! A feature mbin appears to lack?
- 5 Posts
- 45 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
Cake day: May 23rd, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·15 days agoYour submission in “Mamdani’s Anti-DOGE City Savings Plan Includes Firing McKinsey, Not Hiring Them” was removed for schadenfreude. Try !politicaloptimism@piefed.social instead.
Your submission in “Jury finds Instagram and YouTube liable in landmark social media addiction trial” was removed for schadenfreude. Try !politicaloptimism@piefed.social !
Your submission in “Ex-South Korean president found guilty of insurrection over martial law order” was removed for schadenfreude (rule a)1). I would suggest posting to !politicaloptimism@piefed.social…
It says “found guilty”. It says nothing about his punishment or rehabilitation, and with how prison conditions are, I very much suspect that jail time will not be rehabilitation.
Your submission in “Starting tomorrow, New York will increase penalties for serious traffic violations” was removed as schadenfreude (rule a)1).
added a reference to !politicaloptimism@piefed.social .
one moderator of !UpliftingNews@lemmy.world here! is it fine if i make a post (and maybe even edit into the itemized-rules post) directing schadenfreuders to your commag?
Your submission in “A bill that would give legal immunity to pesticide companies such as Bayer, the owner of Roundup, was defeated in Tennessee” was removed as schadenfreude (rule a)1).
Your submission in “There are more registered Democrats in 2025 than registered Republicans” was removed as toxic politics (rule b)).
Your submission to !UpliftingNews@lemmy.world has been removed for involving toxic politics (rule b)).
I would’ve removed this post if I saw it earlier. It’s an interesting article (that surprisingly hasn’t been posted anywhere else yet) but it documents another problem in our society, not any sort of progress or resolution. I would remove, say, “The fight to release the double-tap boat strike video” even if we didn’t have the toxic politics rule.
pinging some of the other mods for their thoughts: @NickwithaC@lemmy.world, @sga@piefed.social, @wolfeh@lemmy.world
deleted by creator
Added rule d) to clarify our current civility policy.
I think the uplifting part of this is supposed to be that more people are going for more non-perishable foods that’d last longer and give families more means to survive than measly plastic-wrapped bars. It’s… a stretch, but I don’t think we should remove it. Feel free to downvote the post if you don’t think it’s a good fit for our commag.
Removed: I don’t see how this is supposed to be uplifting
Your submission in “US news outlets refuse to sign new Pentagon rules to report only official information” was removed as schadenfreude or toxic politics .
It is not.
Your submission in “Still No Kings: Millions to Protest Trump On Saturday” was removed as toxic politics (rule b).
Your submission in “Arnold (Schwarzenegger) reveals Chuck Norris’ last request” was removed as not uplifting.