If they are using paid AI they are just transferring the dynamic from the paid software companies to the paid AI companies as no one will truly understand these apps and be able to maintain them without using AI.

21 Trump Street

The NBC logo kinda looks like the final outcome of the passengers “experience”.

“We ordered a bunch of flatbreads topped with cheese, honey, and fruit for anyone who stays back late tonight.”

The photo has taken Jana from behind.

Nah. Just a bitter old bastard who spent 20+ years dealing with Microsoft sales people on their daft entitlements system.

You only get the capability in copilot to query the licensing if you have CoPilot E4 or an F3 with the monthly add on or attained a copilot ISV but then you have a limited entitlement linked to the base agreement and you need to purchase additional seats but they are of a different tier which need to be upgraded etc etc etc

Never skip penis day.

¿Por qué no los dos?

Jesus Malverde

This comment aims to illuminate the complexities of being seen as a sesquipedalian. Let’s delve dee … (token limit reached)

You sound suspiciously edible Ricky Rigatoni. Was your neighbour named something like Ronny Ramen or similar?

Queso Cristo for the Spanish speakers

This simply came out of me challenging the assertion in a comment higher up stating that a company still needed a CEO/person to be held liable for what the LLM could do. I didn’t think it was that black and white.

See now this is interesting. I believe there is a difference between bad decisions and illegal decisions and what individuals can be held liable for. As long as a company using this “CEO ai can demonstrate reasonable frameworks were in place around the decisions it was acting upon, such as “hmm maybe we won’t eat the first born child of every customer or let’s not spend the companies full cash reserves on crack”, I think there are protections from liability.

I believe the corporation itself is treated as a distinct legal entity for litigation purposes and shields officers of the company unless there are specific circumstances around any individual. I don’t think there is a legal requirement for a corporation to have a CEO. I think this just further confirms the idea of the CEO “role” being fully automated to be more than viable and a genuine costs savings. Much lower risk than relying on AI to replace skilled technical functions.

Someone with more corporate legal knowledge could provide further insight.

Beat me to it! I was going to say we should refer to propaganda material as Bernays Sources.

I see no reason US based AI companies would not carry the same risk especially with the well documented cases of groups like the NSA openly asking US technology companies to provide back doors.

You hit the nail on the head.

Translating for the Linux and Mac folk

“run”

“suit-o run”