There isn’t correlation between an ecclesial issue and secular issue. Christianity forbids women to hold authority over men within the church. However, this doesn’t have anything to do with secular politics, ie, a female prime minister/president doesn’t contradict this. You can have no issue with female political figures or women in other places within secular environments, but disagree with them being appointed in Church leadership.

Same can go for other issues such as same-sex marriage as well, adultery, premarital relations, etc.

I am not a part of your religion. So why should it affect me? The ecclesial structure of churches doesn’t affect you. If you want to form a religion where consenting converts are obliged to beat each other up and be beaten up and steal each others cars, why should I object

That’s what I said, before COVID. After that they decided not to bother anymore.

Although this is mainly western society pre-constantine. In places like Asia and the Arab world there was no advantage in pretending, quite the opposite. So it’s more pure there.

Extremely weird behaviour. Although that was the case until around before covid (in some places it’s still ongoing but it rapidly declines, churches led by atheists also rapidly die out)

There isn’t correlation between an ecclesial issue and secular issue. Christianity forbids women to hold authority over men within the church. However, this doesn’t have anything to do with secular politics, ie, a female prime minister/president doesn’t contradict this. You can have no issue with female political figures or women in other places within secular environments, but disagree with them being appointed in Church leadership.

Same can go for other issues such as same-sex marriage as well, adultery, premarital relations, etc.

This isn’t an American issue, it’s a Christian issue. Christian church structure doesn’t answer to secular morality.

Banning churches is religious bigotry.

Morality isn’t subjective. Morality has an objective foundation. For a Christian, that objective foundation for morality is found within The Bible correctly interpreted and read within context. The Bible forbids women from holding authority over men in ecclesial matters. Therefore it cannot be morally wrong.

Generally, if you’re willing to throw the parts of the bible about not ordaining women out, then you’re generally more willing to throw the whole thing out

Are you advocating that atheists pretend to believe…?

The same rules for marriage applies to men

What’s the point of marriage at all if separating would be easy anyway? Unless you implement some form of legal equality for cohabiting persons

mask off. Bigots out here showing their true colours.

know are morally wrong

How do you know something is morally wrong?

Why are non southern baptist people getting pissed over what happens in the southern baptist convention? It literally doesn’t affect you 😐

And it’s AI generated.

Farage would suck off donald for a bag quavers

EU insists that cars turn on a self-driving feature for lane keeping every ignition cycle. This is a dangerous feature causing cars to be jolted into obstacles.

Yanks out.

AI industry hate is popular among Gen Z I find

Well, there would be safe working environments as well.

Because we’ve never really had a situation for this before. It’s like why it’s not illegal for women to be naked in public, because such a thing was so unimaginable they never legislated it.

Context?