ukraine was fooled into thinking that they could join nato

What utter bullshit.

Ukraine has avoided joining nato as a part of the Budapest treaty with Russia the us and uk.

Until russia attacked Ukraine had no intention or hope of joining nato.

None of these Russian properganda excuses change the one clear fact.

Russia broke that treaty when they attacked not the Ukraine.

This may be amusing in ‘Alice in Wonderland’ where the Queen of Hearts yells, ‘Off with their heads!’ at annoying subjects … and announces a sentence before a verdict,” Howell said, “but this cannot be the reality we are living under.”

Seems to be pretty close. As an outsider the world seems to be seeing trump trample the constitution by going around the 3 equal branches provision and attacking government departments directly.

He seems to be using DOGE to simply cripple any Congress approved spending he disagrees with. And the other branchs really do not seem willing or able to limit his power in time.

This really looks more like a lead up to civil war/hostile take over then politics as usual.

They are a nation with very declared and active enemies. The US sanctions them and shuts them off from world trade.

To suggest they don"t partake in these tricks at all is to clearly lable them as incompetent. I find it hard to believe you have that little respect for them.

If we are unbiased and ignore OPs political claims. (Both/all sides use aid for this when they can).

And the actual statements of skill do not contradict each other. Cuba will be using very different equipmentment and procedures compared to the MX. Just like most poorer nations. A very very skilled doctor in one nation will usually.ly take time to fit into the system and requirements of another. Adding the limited supply from Western medical tech to Cuba due to political restrictions. Well of course things are different. MX for all its immigration hate has a healthy trade with the US.

Anyone who thinks Western doctors have nothing to learn when going to Africa etc. Is rather unrealistic.

All amounts to the same thing.

Your just a guy eh is in a position to choose 1 or 5. And did not. So from that point. Yes you chose to allow 4 people to die. The death of those people is on your hands when you chose to do nothing.

You seem desperate not to make the choice but the responsibility for that lack of choice still lies with you.

Just as you were in a position to choose trump or Harris. So trump is as much your fault for failing to vote a viable alternative. As if you had chosen to vote him. Just because do not like either option dose not forgive you the effect of not choosing.

You really seem to be failing to understand. And simple typos are easy to read around. I’m visually impaired so have little patience for that excuse.

As you said its a thought experiment. As you say you only have two options. Rejecting responsibility is the same as leaving the lever in the kill 5 position.

Pull or don’t pull. If you pull 1 person dies. If you don’t 5 die. There is no don’t kill.

Yes the person tieing them to the track murdered them. But just like not voting you don’t get to rewind time amd select better candidates. As the guy in the signal box. Your duty iss to direct the train. Just as your duty is to vote. Not wanting people to have been tied to the track is obviose but not an answer. Unless you are the one willing to invent a time machine. Your duty is still to direct the train.

Not voting leaves you with trump. Because you live in a fptp nation where 3rd parties just reduce the opposing vote.

Just like not pulling the lever means 5 folks died. You still had the task to direct the train. Refusing to pull the lever still leave you responsible for 5 rather then one dying.

Refusing to take responsibility dose not forgive you for failing to select the lesser evil. You are still directly responsible for choosing the greater evil by failing to pull the lever.

Rejecting responsibility and blaming others is not an option provided. Because the thought experiment recognises you live in a system where you have to make choices based on facts not your hopes and wishes. You live in a world where if you don’t have the option to stop the train. Or prevent the arsehole tying people to the tracks. You still have responsibilities. I refuse to play still has an effect on the world you live in. Like it or not.

Bollocks.

It is a thought experiment. Where you do not get to dobt murder someone.

That is the whole fucking point.

Just like not voting dosent stop evil running the nation.

You are the one misinterpreting. By some how inventing the dont murder somone option.

Just because you dont like it. Dos not mean you get to invent your own interpretations.

Amd its not misinterpreted. The whole point of using the trolly problem is as an example as it was designed. Thought experiments are there to help you interpret real actions by simplifying them. Not to be ignored as pointless.

You are still the one making the choice.

Hence why the trolly problem is equivalent to a political vote. Not voting has the same effect as not making a choice between one or 5.

If you are there before they get tied to the track you do more. But that is not the situation you are in on election day.

On election day its to late to change candidates. Just as its to late to try and untie the victims. If you do not have correct of the breaks or the ability to stop the trolly on time.

Your only option is to choose or not to choose the lesser of 2 evils.

Failing to choose is no less evil then choosing the worst.

Elon musk tells republicans (and theworld). He is in no way qualified to run a government department.

After claiming he is not in control of acts that only happened when his department was formed under him. Within a month.

Sorta like the trolly problem.

You can flip the lever to kill 5 or 1. But if you choose not to and also don’t fucking bother to hit the breaks. Your still responsible for killing 5 instead of 1.

If you are not willing to actually stop the evil fai.ing to selects make you the bigger evil.

All true. But the world also watched a huge amount of voters rejects dems over gaza. While trump had no better plans on gaxa.

Much like Ukraine his only argument is “i am better and every one else was stupid”

The argument often heard. “Voting the lesser of 2 evils is still voting evil”.

So yes these folks very much voted the greater of 2 evils by refusing to vote the lesser option. And much of the rest of the world is rightfully sorta pissed at the evil they allowed in.

The one really great thing about this was that it was straight-up televised proof that Trump and company are authoritarian fascists.

Anyone who did not know this. Is unlikely to be swung by this event.

They will likely agree with trumps illogical sign the deal first crap. Thinking like trump. IE “beggers can’t be choosers and if Ukraine wants anything they should bow the the all mighty USA.”

I’ve not seen any evidence that evidence matters one jot to these voters. They will interpret anything in their favour.

Remember when “presidents” used to get impeached over the smallest thing?

A president not multiple. Its nor exactly common. There has only ever been 4 presidential impeachment since since the usa formed. And only ever been one that actually happened.

Andrew Johnson 1868 impeached by Congress and removed by the senate.

Bill clinton impeached im 1998 but the democratic majority in the senate ignored it.

DON’T RUMP in 2019 but the republican majority in the senate ignored it.

DON’T RUMP again in 2021 but the republican majority in the senate ignored it.

So trump has been half of all presidential impeachment in US history.

Just for accuracy.

Congress impeached. The republican majority in the senate refused to remove him.

Yeah thanks for the effort. You would be stunned at how many web sites make no effort.

Many modern web sites often fail miserably, especially scripted ones. But mostly because companies just don’t care. As you say it is hard work. So when companies outsource that hard work is rarely if ever asked for up front. And the cost to modify existing site is hugew…

But remember if we are talking software. Again all the pro measures are based on 0 or 100% able. So again leave all disabled depending on solutions that slow down workload.

All the laws on the West only require reasonable accomadations. And being less productive is never considered reasonable. Or in anyway a hope for a successful career.

So with so much software moving to Web apps. Those AA standards rarely help beyond making the page usable. If your career depends on performance as almost all do. Most disabled are not able to efficiently use them.

Honestly best approach is to find some small projects you feel need help. Introduce yourself to the development team and offer time and suggestions. Eventually one will say yes.

But as a visually impaired developer I’ll give you a heads up. Most pro non foss ui is freaking awfull for accessibility. The choices made over the last 20 year are just bad. OS is far from perfect. But I find the interfaces generally work way better with enlarged text then anything using modern UI ideals.

So please if you get involved. Remember accessibility is more complex the let voice assist work. Most blind folks have some vision. And rellying on the Systems accessibility options is not enough for us to be able to use software in a competitive way.

OS software using the UIs designers seem to dislike. Is generally more customisable for font sizes and colour options accross different parts of the system. In ways able folks would just never consider. This allows us to actually layout software so we only need magnifiers or text readers for things we individually rarely need to read. But can increase the stuff we do in ways that allow us to work at competitive speeds.

Modern UI design is pecomming less accessible as the software becomes much more complex but developers of ui tools seem to see disability as a 0 or 100% slowing disabled users with some ability down to the point they are unemployable.

Please please try to avoid moving the OS stuff we can use that way as well.

Answer is pretty obvious.

Either they do not believe it is a genocide. Or they are working to convince everyone they believe it is not.

Either way both are not reporting it as such. So avoiding such interviews would be hypocritical of them.

Its a bit like asking farrage why he dosent change his name to dickhead. Weather he believes he is one. Or just want you to think not. Nothing he’s ever done would suggest its likely to make decisions based on admitting it.

Go get drunk. You deserve it.

Back in my much older days, people used newsgroups/email/ and before that, magazines to work out how to use windows.

You guys that grew up with the windows’ dominance, forget all you actually had to learn. You think of windows like riding a bike. Not because of windows design. But because you have been doing it all your life and learned the stuff when you were freshly minded and quick to learn.

I’m not opposed to AI. Although atm it can get shit wrong more often then other sources so care is required.

But please stop thinking your need to learn is a Linux issue. Rather than a complex system issue. .