

If they weren’t, the headline probably wouldn’t have used the comparative


If they weren’t, the headline probably wouldn’t have used the comparative


WhatsApp built its user base on the promise of free messaging
Really? Because initially, WhatsApp did actually charge money for the service, though it was only $1 a year. But I don’t remember them ever promising free messaging.
Fun fact, WhatsApp wasn’t even designed as a messenger in the first place, it was just meant as an app to show your status (like “at the movies”), but then evolved into one.


I don’t think it was that channel linking them.


What you’re implying makes no sense.
The ships passing are not “NATO owned”. They’re most likely not even ships owned by the armed forces of NATO countries apart from the US. And even if they were attacked, this is outside of the territory of the NATO member state, which is a condition for triggering article 5.


Firefox always has tabs, in fact even the Mozilla Application Suite had them since 2001. Gmail came out 3 years later. Though I would have thought that there were about 5 years between these events


That swiping keyboard typo happens way more often to me than it doesn’t


I totally know how NATO works (am former soldier from a NATO country), I know Mario is a defensive treaty and even if you’re a member it doesn’t mean other member nations have to cooperate with you outside of NATO related activities. So yes no NATO members need to join, and no NATO member has to support the US (even if just by allowing to use the air space) outside of NATO missions it exercises.


If Putin knows NATO is a paper tiger, why is he complaining about countries joining it? Why does he complain about NATO member countries on Russia’s borders? Surely a paper tiger isn’t detrimental to his interests? Why did they claim Russia is fighting NATO in Ukraine?
Total disconnect from reality


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ploi723hg4 this is the video, it’s about situations where normal filters have issues cropping out the content without spill or when some objects are reflective or transparent.


Hey, I’m well aware this doesn’t justify it in any way and this isn’t what any tech bro had in mind. I’m just saying there have been advancements in a maybe unexpected area of video editing. But I thought this was clear from three way I worded my comment


There recently was a video on YouTube about how they trained an AI to actually isolate content from greenscreen where the results were very promising. So while maybe not revolutionary, it did prove to be very helpful. Though we all know that’s not the billion dollar thing these investments were for.


He’s just preparing for an out, in a week or two he can tell on TV that Iran agreed to all demands and as such, the US gets out. Won’t work most likely, but maybe he’ll try.
That or he seriously believes this has happened because someone told him. Who knows! Or he might just contradict himself.


As I said, he’s just flinging shit, it is dumb. But you have the same ideology on both sides, they’re very different cuts from the same cloth, so I don’t mind. There’s no real effect on common affairs, the connection between Japan declining to help and this isn’t there, no country is committing to any action in the strait.


Handpicked by Kegsbreath


The joke was almost more controversial than the fact that Japan who committed the possibly most heinous crimes against humanity in WWII never apologized or admitted to any wrongdoing.
yup he was flinging dumb shit but it hit the right target. Let the conservative nationalists fight each other. I can’t be outraged by this one


deleted by creator


Oh given the fact that I assume Trump voters are racist my comment was a backhand compliment, but I guess the sarcasm wasn’t obvious enough.


Racists were right, there is a relation between the color of your skin and your intelligence


An example of selection bias
“We asked a group of people defining themselves as approving of everything Trump does if they approve of this thing Trump did, and the results are overwhelming!” What would be more interesting is whether that actual group has stayed the same size ever since he made his latest decisions
Let’s not get ahead of ourselves