Your penis doesn’t work just fine if you were circumcised. You are one of the brainwashed people I was talking about.
Read about the function of the foreskin, which is way more than a bit of hanging skin on the end of your member, it’s a sensitive and double-sided tissue that keeps your internal bits where they belong.
In my experience, the strongest critics of MGM are victims of circumcision. There are some brainwashed people who don’t see what the big deal is, but people with normal penises (and women) don’t seem to care much one way or the other.
Genital mutilation is weird, doubly so when it’s for a religion you don’t even follow
“That bad” is subjective but I don’t think she/they say anything particularly insightful and seems like a Mary Sue type. Kinda like Adam Ellis and CAD from a few years earlier. Technically accomplished but soulless. It’s like the Big Bang Theory of Reddit front page comics.
Are you a communist or something? What’s wrong with you?
You thought PPP inflation was bad?
What’s the financial angle?
90% of people do not care about this
Meal prep as much as possible. If you hate cooking but realize it’s got to be done, might as well cook double at a time so you can relax the next night.
It would help to know what types of cooking/foods you prefer if you want more specific shortcuts
Even Ed Zitron has mellowed out in the last year with the rationalist opinion of “it’s a probabilistic model being asked to do deterministic things,” and “it makes the easy things easier and the harder things harder.”
The overwheling majority of “anti AI” comments I see are either 1) anti LLM, B) anti hyperscaler business / marketing practices, C) anti data center, or usually D) any combination of the above. Very little about the objective, architectural functions of language models.
If you want a machine learning model that actually works, you need to feed it good data. If you hire an AI slop enthusiast to feed the model mass junk data, you will have a bad time.
You understand the strawmanning and logical fallacy here right? A person can appreciate novel technologies from afar, understand when/if theyre appropriate for their job, and then do their unrelated work just fine without a personality purity test
Mike will get it done
Cioran vindicated. Ligotti - We are all uncanny things. May we all march gracefully out.
Chuck Schumer has got his most serious pen out for this one! You know, the one with the skulls on it he got from Myrtle Beach
Lmao okay smooth brain. I tested in the 99th percentile on my last test. I wasnt even at my peak cognitive powers and I wasnt mentally challenged at all.
Its whatever I say it is to get rid of people who annoy me
Low IQ people shouldn’t breed and I believe this 100% at this point
E: this is literally the argument of Idiocracy btw
If you highlight every other word it loses it’s significance
Useful idiots; short-term good, long-term remains unclear.
This is most of the reason why I keep my opinion to myself every time I see his name crop up every day but I think that he is specifically a horrible person to represent the movement and a good example of just how impossible it is to maintain quality the larger your target audience is.
Both complete lies btw