

I didn’t check cloudflare yet, but I will need to double check their policies. Although I do know domain names and renewal shafting are a known problem


I didn’t check cloudflare yet, but I will need to double check their policies. Although I do know domain names and renewal shafting are a known problem


I will check once I get the chance. Thanks!


When you send an email stating you want to exercise your gdpr rights, more often than not the companies asks for an identification of some sort. I’ve seen in multiple threads on other services that when that happens is common to ask for an Id. Which actually creates a chilling effect, making people less likely to go with the gdpr enforcement. So by default they don’t ask for anything, but the language implies the capability is there in case the gdpr clause is brought up


I am not going to say this is a one country specific problem. However, we for sure need to start a much needed scrutiny regarding cars in general and privacy/security, and we need to start somewhere
I actually have a question about this: if I agree to a version of the ToS, later there is an update, and I do not agree with the changes, should not be the case I keep using something out of date but also with a certain version of the ToS?
Asking in legal terms here, since companies like to put these changes as “accept or walk away” sort of situation, but I am almost sure this is actually either illegal or very close to that (and no, ToS, or a contract, is NOT above the law. So don’t even bother with that point)


From my perspective has to do with form factor more than anything else. These smart glasses at a glance are indistinguishable from regular glasses. A phone looks like a phone, so people know what’s up at a glance.
This is actually a very interesting concept to try to make a piece . in case you are the original author: would you consider trying to do more on this one?


Considering as of now generated stuff without much change does not have a copyright it is also not possible to apply a license. I am not a lawyer but I am quite sure about this one.


From what I understand from the article, generating code does not grant copyright, although of it is proven that most of the work is human made then you can have a copyright (to what percentage has to be manual work to have a copyright? Afaik, nothing is in the article). So with this in mind, I see that you cannot apply a license what essentially does not have a copyright (if most effort is not manual) but maybe someone can prove me wrong.
He’s a good boy, deserves his couch
… Why does feels like this guy was being bullied in his own home? Jesus that is a lot to handle (this + the wife reaction on another post)


When I first saw Subaru impresa back in 1998 I was a child, but I could see how special the car was. In fact, during late 90s and 2000s we had some very special cars coming out of rally.


Reminds me of this



There is actually a lot more to this: a lot of people in the it sec crowd have been saying for many years that this habit of the gibberish passwords with symbols capitals and whatnot is actually a net deficit in security. Mostly because for the longest time people had to mostly remember all passwords and the policies for rotation were to aggressive (which lead to “lazy” changes). Nowadays unfortunately we still have people that inherited this thinking and still enforce this, but you also see a lot of people understanding that pass phrases are a lot better (of course should not be a predictable phrase like good morning, but it is possible to make it much better with way less effort)


The perfect picture of the roomba ranch


Exactly like my stakeholders at my job: they introduce a term, refuse to further explain it until half development is done and we find out via other methods wtf is that, and understanding that everything needs to change, for the fifth time


I do not know how China works internally, but sounds difficult to be at home at times with your family


On Lemmy there has been a lot of reaction against anything llms, no matter positive or negative for the technology. Granted, llms made everything worse, and the leaders of it won’t stop doom trolling. Which makes a lot of people averse to anything relates to llms, and worse, relate to ai = llms, which could not be further from the truth. Let’s see with time how it evolves, but right now is the direction taken is neither good or functional
Pun intended?