That’s more understandable. Not particularly convincing or informative, but more understandable.

If you can’t communicate normally, providing specific information rather than parables and circumlocution, I don’t see why anyone should take you seriously.

Is this some sort of rage/engagement bait? Lol

My views on top tier hierarchic secrecy changed after learning about the Lewis Powell memo while listening to The Lever’s Master Plan podcast & simultaneously reading Gareth Gore’s Opus.

Is this supposed to mean anything?

It’s an idiom…

It’s available to me. Before the dinner, Karoline Leavitt says to a journalist: “He is ready to rumble, I will tell you. This speech tonight will be classic Donald J Trump. It’ll be funny, it’ll be entertaining. There will be some shots fired tonight in the room. So everyone should tune in, it’s going to be really great.”

There’s actually no proof the Moscow theatre hostage crisis was staged either. You’re supporting a conspiracy theory by pointing to an another conspiracy that you just made up. Y’all have completely given up on critical thinking.

That’s an impressive level of disingenuousness.

Show the rest of the graph please.

I am disappointed this isn’t used on any Wiki article.

It was a wolf who promised to the sheeps he’ll eat all the cows so the sheep will have more grass for themselves.

If you can’t help but see a consistent position against the death penalty as “Nazi apologia”, that’s your problem.

There used to be exploding-heads.com, it was right-wing but not particularly active IIRC

“Laughable”, “disingenuous”, “you’re wilfully lying”, wow easy with those arguments there. I made the comparison based on your own logic.

Try walking into Gaza like that.

Try walking into an Uyghur reeducation camp, lmao.

If I were a zionist, I’d definitely use this sort of argument when talking about Palestinians. Lol you can go to West Bank and talk to them, therefore there’s no genocide.

By ‘these people’ I mean people who didn’t vote (because they don’t care how many die), not the politicians.

That’s cool and everything, but these people don’t actually care how many people die in which scenario.

Let me guess, it’s an AI-generated subpoena?

You barely responded to anything I wrote. The key words seem to correspond, but nothing here actually builds upon the previous comments, it’s either restating things or saying something (as far as I see) unrelated and illogical.

What exactly are my own best interests that I’m supposedly voting against by supposedly voting for Democrats? Why are my best interests crucial here anyway? Could we also take into account the 200 dead Iranian children’s best interests? I think they’re more important than mine, honestly.

Who tied these people to the tracks?

A mentally ill guy who’s mentally ill because his alcoholic father treated him horribly as a kid, and his father was an alcoholic because he lost his job because of the economic recession.

What now?

are they watching me decide?

Why do you care? Does that affect your decision?

There is no “non-rigged” game, this is a very messy world burdened with centuries of unfairness. At some point you’ll have to move on from merely pointing out who’s at fault towards actually trying to fix things.