Axum

Can’t have hardware for us to archive. That’s only for the ai overlords to archive the internet for their own personal Ai models.

Technology gentrification go brrr

Yeah this whole comment section is weird as fuck.

Bupa is a British multinational health insurance and healthcare company

Maybe he should reflect on what happened at United Healthcare

I think you have no idea what you are asking.

Because the answer is “Have enough capital to afford to be a local ISP”

https://a.aliexpress.com/_msfObvf

Bear in mind these are probably not production grade. So if you have a real use case that needs to last don’t use these. But for messing around and doing hobby projects these are fine.

Openly downloadable ai models are here. You may as well download one and play with it on your own hardware so that you can learn the it’s and outs of it as well as limitations and use cases

Feel free to stay on DOS gramps

Make a swapfile and continue on with life.

Anyone reaching for powerQuery in excel should not, and instead be reaching for something like PowerBI.

None of those positions are expected to know VBA script either.

Old isn’t necessarily bad, unless years of decision-making have left it in a massively complex state (see also: Xorg)

The real reason here is that LibreOffice is written in C++, which is falling rapidly out of fashion for modern apps, leading to a smaller supply of developers.

Contrast this with Onlyoffice. Yes, the document engine is still written in C++, however the build tools use more modern items like python and onlyoffice supports having Javascript frontends and scripting, making it easier to source web devs to work on these parts.

Starlink devices are currently the only approved ones.

Maybe the article is not biased, maybe, just maybe, the tech deserves this huge backlash because it is trash and nobody asked for it, not even game devs, or whatever you call people who make games but their games are not in need for this tech

If you can’t recognize bias in an obviously biased article, then your media literacy skills need work so that you can recognize different types of bias.

Hell even the current popular LLM’s, which are glorified statistics chat bots, can see this pattern and identify heavily statistical traits of bias in this article.

If you bother reading the article, you’ll note that the majority of developers interviewed are not people who would need this technology to begin with. Like all technologies, it is a choice to integrate it.

This article selected specifically for voices that were already against it/had no need for it.

Whether the tech is good or bad is irrelevant, because the article is horribly biased in one direction.

ok so I asked you to list precisely what game devs they interviewed and you gave me nothing.

Thanks for confirming you cannot parse the article of specific info.

Yeah. Did you read it? I did. Tell me what you understood from the article you read on the precisely WHO was interviewed, because I have doubts on your reading comprehension.

you don’t have a point, there is nothing to discuss,

Nice assumption, too bad its wrong.

Remind me again exactly who was interviewed in this article and what roles they have in?

This is such a braindead take that completely misses my original point. I know reading levels have dropped globally but come on now, you can do better.

“we interviewed only haters and they all of them complained about the thing they hate”

What a garbage article.

No you don’t, don’t be stupid. uv is open source, and this just funds that project. Don’t gaslight yourself.