One of:

• eyes to see a wider spectrum of light (infrared to gamma-ray)
• ears to increase sensitivity or reduce it close to 0 a will
• nose to smell all dangerous stuff that is odourless (carbon monoxide f.e.)
• muscles not to lose training after a few days (I am not sure that wouldn’t fuck up methabolism)
• have an organ to catch radiowaves (while being capable to switch it off)
• brown fat cells to never feel cold (with added super bonus that they also kill cancer by starving it)
• liver to remove toxins without being easily damaged

The choice is difficult :)

There is a huge difference between a private owner, and a corporation. Anyhow they might have a common approach, I would say estate ownership should be limited to a certain number through incremental taxation the more you own the larger the tax bracket, like we do for income

“You look like a guy I saw in an episode of Rick and Morty” Smile “Elon Tusk?” “No Mr Poopy Butthole”

There is already a concept from french nobility about that… Didn’t prevent their head to roll in the end

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noblesse_oblige?wprov=sfla1

You can balance it adjusting the rocket nozzle

Assuming good faith, that’s a hell of an assumption

Many good ones were already mentioned

But from memory:

• The snatch
• The big Lebowsky
• Clerks
• American Psycho
• 2001 a space odissey
• Blade Runner (possibly the directors cut)
• Apocalypse now (possibly the redux version)
• Full metal jacket
• The godfather (first 2 movies, the rest is not as good)
• Fight club
• Alien
• The Truman show
• In the mouth of madness
• They live
• The terminator (first 2)
• Animal house
• the dollar trilogy from Sergio Leone
• Once upon a time in America
• pulp fiction
• reservoir dogs

I think, that having purpose in life helps, and women tend to prioritize social connection from a very young age, therefore they are on average more connected and that helps in finding purpose. The rest is pure force of will to fulfill the purpose

Quite unusual, was it pure? As far as I know they always mix it with other nasty stuff beig it an excellent polar solvent

Why not rich assholes? Is actually fitting to a very large majority

Or rich psychopaths

This is right. This requires a discussion a bit wider than 420 letters, even more when they come from Rowling

Km is 10³m cm is 10^-2m so the difference is 10⁵ i.e. 100000 (one with 5 zeroes)

Or more intuitively one centi-meter is a 1/100 of a meter and Kilo-Meter is 1000 meter therefore 100*1000 100000

It is quite intuitive, once you start using it

What’s weird is why we don’t use Megameters and megagrams (i.e. one metric ton)

If only there was a solution, I don’t know, a cable resistent to jamming the ether, something we could call ether-jamming-resistant-network, in short Ethernet

I know… I am just dreaming :-P

Funghi

Sorry, but you are wrong, battery means exactly chemical battery

Gravity electrical storage is not a battery

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_battery?wprov=sfla1

The taxes should be an exponential function of the income, no tax brackets

I never understood why it isn’t like that

At least a quadratic or cubic function

But that’s about the local temperature of the year, it says nothing about the glaciers shrinking or expanding, also if glaciers are shrinking, wouldn’t we lose some readings? I mean if the glacier this year is smaller than last year, means that we have lost at least one year readings (most likely much more than that), not to mention that it contradicts that ice gets deposited every year.

It is my understanding that glaciers expand and shrink seasonally every year, and lately the expansion (if any) is always smaller than the shrinking, but it is a trend that started more than 100y ago (basically since when we started keeping record) and has been accellerating, because of this how can you extrapolate when to start dating in reverse? If you never saw a the, let’s call it inflationary phase, how do you know when it reversed? The error might be small… or not

Is there an error in my reasoning (or my assumptions)? Consider that I am not the only one having this doubts.

anyhow do you know the answer? Because I’d have a ton of questions, since the argument is complex and I don’t like the hand-wavy argument “well he expert say so”

Experts, scientists, luminaries in their field were prescribing lobotomies to mentally ills and castrations to gay people less than 100 years ago, so yes please always listen to the experts, but keep doubting their answers

All climatologist on this thread, please raise your hand

If you see the number of down votes, for pointing out something that is worth keeping into account, I’d say that is what is “not allowing”

I concede that maybe it’s just my impression