
The question is whether “brand” is “JoJoFromJerz” or “Polymarket”, or both.

The question is whether “brand” is “JoJoFromJerz” or “Polymarket”, or both.

No, you see it’s an ad for that gambling site that was boosted by a twitter influencer who added value by saying “Let’s fucking go!!! 🔥” And, after that, someone screenshotted this influencer’s post that boosted the gambling site and posted it here. Then people upvoted it.
Was that influencer paid to promote the gambling site? Probably. Was OP paid? Probably not, just a useful idiot.
Tried multiple times, failed every time. That’s more than just propaganda.

Add I understand it, the real meaning of that line is not exactly what it sounds like
As someone who was around at the time, I think people meant it exactly as said. Partially it was an observation that most online spaces were really male-dominated. Partially it was a “no girlz allowd” sign. A lot of places were extremely hostile to women. The best that someone who admitted to being a girl or woman could hope for is a flood of messages from horny boys. That also made it a self-fulfilling prophecy. Girls would either stay away, or they’d pretend to be male just to avoid the drama.
Baking bread has gone from an everyday job employing a significant fraction of the workforce to more of an artistic job that only a few people do. Bakers don’t really compete with mass produced bimbos, instead they offer a premium product for people who are willing to pay more.
I think it’s always like that when technologies get replaced. There are still people offering horse-drawn carriage rides, but it’s a specialty service now instead of a common job. Same with many of the things you find on Etsy.
Jobs being replaced by automation wouldn’t be a bad thing if the benefits were shared with the whole population and there were a social safety net for people whose jobs were eliminated. Unfortunately, the benefits always go to the people at the top. Some theorists have proposed economic systems where there are no people at the top, or where things are shared much more fairly. It’s a sad fact that those systems seem incompatible with human nature as it stands. Country-sized experimentation with anarchism or communism still leads to people at the top who take a lot more than they give. Those systems seem to work fine in small communities where everyone knows each-other. But, not when they are implemented in countries containing millions of people.
The most effective systems right now seem to be mixed socialist / capitalist systems where unions are strong and willing to call major strikes and shut the country down. You still get “haves” and “have nots”, but the “have nots” still get a voice and aren’t completely trampled by the rich.
It’s not necessarily envy. It just could be that they get caught up in the idea that everyone looks better bald.
As in, “your hair is fine, don’t do it”?

Yeah, there are people who search for themselves and want an ego boost. I search for myself and hope to find nothing.
I bet someone with good hair has asked, but I wonder what they replied.

The people who came after me didn’t know that one and started putting their birth year, hometown, etc. into their usernames.
What I wonder is how that subreddit would respond if someone with good hair, or even just decent hair posted. Do they ever respond “no bro, you have good hair!” I would bet that it becomes a “when you have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail” type situation.


LLMs are an obvious dead end when it comes to actual “intelligence” or understanding how the world works.
But, this sounds like a “draw the rest of the owl” situation.
“JEPA learns abstract representations of how the world works, ignoring unpredictable surface detail.”
Oh, it’s that simple is it? Just have it “learn abstract representations of how the world works”. Amazing how nobody thought to do that before!
I think I understand the distinction they’re trying to draw. Current models are trained on billions of pictures of cats and billions of pictures of dogs. You feed it an image of Fido and it finds a point in 2500 dimensional space and knows whether that point is in the “cat space” or “dog space”. It can be very good, but it doesn’t have any “understanding” of what makes something a cat vs. a dog. Humans, OTOH, aren’t trained on billions of images. But, they learn about things like “teeth” and “whiskers” and “snouts” and “eyes”. Within their knowledge of eyes, they spot that vertical slit pupils are unusual and different, and part of what makes something “catlike”. AFAIK, nobody has ever managed to create a system that learns abstract features without intensive human training.
I like that they’re trying something new. But, are they counting on a massive breakthrough on a problem that has existed since people first started theorizing about AI? Or, is it just a matter of refining a known process?
I hope whoever this was recorded these snipers for as long as possible.


We don’t really know. Maybe they stopped completely and honoured the deal. Maybe they didn’t even slow down and just hid what they were doing.
We know that they allowed international inspectors in while the deal was active though, so at the very least they had to work harder to hide things if they were continuing to work.


That would be nice. But, one common theme with religious people is that they always believe that they are going to heaven, but everyone else isn’t.


Interesting, I didn’t realize that. I thought all of the groups Iran supported were Shia.


It would be funny if they weren’t actually trying to bring about the biblical end-times. Also, they don’t care at all about the future because they don’t believe that the future will exist, since we’re in endtimes.


What’s going on:
Israel and Iran:
Trump, Racists, and Evangelicals:
Israel’s latest attacks:
Hormuz
What’s Next:


I really can’t imagine any situation where I might feel sympathy for someone who lost money on a memecoin.
The other one’s a brand too.