• 25 Posts
  • 822 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Riker is ultimately one of the best possible examples of a character who doesn’t make sense from a Watsonian point of view because he was used for Doylist purposes. Realistically, Riker should have either left for his own command or taken command of the Enterprise if they’d ended up going with killing Picard in the Borg arc. Instead, he stays on the show in his same job because he’s a well-acted, charismatic fan-favorite who’s also a military administrator with no technical specialty: in other words, he’s the ideal audience-insert character to ask people like Geordi or Beverly to explain a complicated concept so they can have expository dialog for our benefit. For those who know Stargate SG-1, he’s strikingly similar to Jack O’Neill, whose most common script function is to say “uh, can you try that again in English?” in conversations about archaeology or theoretical physics.

    That said, they did do a decent job working with that in-universe. There’s actually something compelling with having Riker’s story arc play with the idea that sometimes a person can grow to regret their own ambition, discovering instead that they can actually grow more by putting down roots for a while than they would have by doing the most that they could. But it doesn’t really work in the long run, and there’s a reason he was always depicted as a Captain in every glimpse of the future.



















  • Emotion and empathy are core and required components of sapience in addition to intelligence, in the same way that eggs and sugar are necessary components of cake; no amount of sophistication will render a cake from just flour. An entity that doesn’t have emotion and empathy is too primitive and limited to be sapient regardless of its computational power because it lacks fundamental building blocks of awareness.

    Before you try to get out in front of me with this: I’m fully aware that there are human beings with no empathy or emotion. I will not elaborate and I am taking no questions.



  • pimento64@sopuli.xyztoBaseballDo the Owners of MLB Teams Even Like Baseball?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The teams share a vast amount of revenue, not all of which is disclosed outside of the league and owners; so much in fact that MLB actually just spun off MLB.TV as its own company so that they wouldn’t have to disclose its net income in the upcoming CBA negotiation. The bare minimum that every MLB team is guaranteed to take in even if zero tickets get sold this year is nearly $100 million, and credible insiders say it’s well more than double that in reality. MLB is a legal monopoly made up of an extremely corrupt cartel of colluding businessmen and they absolutely do not have any intention of presenting their finances in any remotely fair or accurate light. A salary cap would benefit the owners, and should be opposed unconditionally on that basis alone. Personally, I’m team hard salary floor with a luxury tax soft cap.