Let the base kick ooooooooooo AAE-O-A-A-U-U-A- E-eee-ee-eee AAAAE-A-E-I-E-A- OO-ooo-oo-oo-oo EEEEO-A-AAA-AAAA

I take it you’re not a fan of the borrow rules?

Would you rather manage your memory yourself, or would you rather use a language with a runtime?

Those are your only 2 remaining options for managing memory if you exclude rust-like reference constraints.

Wasm bindgen is an absolute nightmare of auto-generated function names. From a purely performance/functionality perspective it works but it’s hella ugly. I hope some alternative arrives at some point.

The ban is for all forms of gender affirming care (i.e, hrt, non-physical)

So does old reddit but its also the only version of the site I find usable. UX people can have absurdly lopsided priorities.

Good luck determining which combination of its 1.5 billions weights/biases corresponds to sympathy for the chinese.

Deepseek’s responses to questions about the ccp are likely not implemented in the same manner as the oversight mechanisms preventing you from asking about illicit drug production and whatnot.

If sufficient information about the CCP is literally not provided to it in its training data then it is not a simple matter of turning the mechanism on or off.

Set don’t forget set -E as well to exit on failed subshells.

Sorry if this response is mal-informed and misses some important part of your workflow, but if all you’re trying to do is run a postman collection then all you really need is newman.

Nothing against office workers trying to scrape by and make a living but holy fuck did this company ever have this coming.

Nothing like watching the greedy ouroboros devour itself in real time.

I understand your perspective but at the end of the day all you’re doing is justifying why you should be able to disregard this guy’s blog post under the premise that he comes off as someone who’s full of himself.

At the end of the day vaxray’s ability to state that “almost all the other compositors suck beyond opening terminal windows” should be tied to whether or not the statement is true/justifiable; it shouldn’t be tied to whether or not people can’t stand the optics of it.

I’m not the one going around making statements that imply reliable wayland compositors can just be readily whipped up and shipped out.

You can complain about the guy’s ego if you feel like he’s talking up his product too much, but if you’re going to reject valid statements he’s making under the assumption that they’re all self-motivated and therefore incorrect, then you should be able to justify the position.

Oh lit so you wrote up your own compositor?

Where would you rather they go? Fucking Auschwitz??

I ended up coding my own.

Lots of stuff I’d want in an applications launcher on hyperland. I’d need it to have all the functions of the important system indicators and essentially take the role of the top panel in gnome.

“Still not voting for genocide”

You say as you side with Hamas who openly calls for the genocide of the Jewish race.

Well,.that’s one way to solve the problem of not expanding your editor var correctly…

That’s not the same as content distribution.

Sharing content to clients cannot be effectively done through creative cloud.

It does not make sense to try and stop the distribution at the level of video editing. Not only is the thought of child predators making regular use of professional editing software completely absurd, but even if you assume they do, why the fuck do you think they would use the inbuilt cloud sharing tools to do so?? They would just encrypt the contents and transmit it over any other file sharing service…

It makes no sense to implement this measure because it does absolutely nothing to impede criminals, but enables a company well known for egregious privacy violations unprecedented access to information completely law abiding clients have legitimate reasons to want to keep private.

It is a farce. A smokescreen intended to encroach on customers precious data all the while doing nothing to assist law enforcement.

Adobe is not a video distribution platform. They do not have this level of culpability.

Sounds like a smokescreen to me. All file sharing services have this problem. The solution is to respond to subpoena requests and let the government do their jobs. They do not have to allow themselves to arbitrarily violate their users privacy in order to do that.