Have you considered a career as a baby?

Ask the outraged masses, commenting on opinion pieces here or on reddit as if they’re actual policy. Truth isn’t the point, anger is, and opinions generate a lot more than fact does.

I see this constantly on the internet. “Some backwater Podunk state puts the 10 commandments in classrooms” becomes “The US puts the 10 commandments in classrooms”. It’s like people don’t understand how this country is architected.

Flush with cash from the military industrial complex, repurposing factories built for the war, and with its largest economic rivals lying in ruin. Yes.

People have never hesitated to say Pelosi, Klobuchar, or Slotkin, for example.

That’s a really good point

Did you ever wish mass effect had a weaker story and Bethesda loot mechanics?

Since the first round of updates it’s less buggy than fallout 4 at least

deleted by creator

Those are not members of the Nazi party.

I disagree. Fewer rapists is an improvement. Getting rid of rapists isn’t the moral high ground, it’s a necessary moral imperative. Id rather have one party that acts like Republicans than two.

You joke but there’s at least one person in this thread that seems to be seriously suggesting that

He raped someone. Are you saying we should let him continue on as if nothing happened in order to own the Republicans?

It smells a little like sexism, like theyre taken more casually than male candidates. But your point about Hillary Clinton is a good one. I don’t know the answer tbh.

The only man I can think of who falls under this phenomenon is Bernie Sanders. In his case it seems like a conscious decision on the part of his campaign.

I know. I’m not blaming you or criticizing you. I’m not even sure this phenomenon is problematic, and if it is you’re just following everyone else’s lead. I do think it’s worth thinking about, though.

Hillary and Kamala

You mentioned 5 candidates in your post. Two of them are women, and they’re the two that you called by their first names. It’s not just you, I see that a lot. I can’t help but think that also has something to do with it.

I don’t think that’s enough. That was a reason not to vote for her. She never gave us any compelling reasons to vote for her other than “I’m not trump”. Considering she has the gravitas of a dead cod, she’s going to need some really compelling policy plans to pull it off.

What’s stopping individual states from doing it? Blue states like California and New York are bigger than some European countries that have it.

Unless somehow you’re lucky enough to own a property large enough

So anything with a closet?

Your inclusion of doug makes me doubt the rest of your list

Great news for trans mice