• ryepunk [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      The most positive I’ve heard is that it is a by the numbers Bethesda rpg game. It doesn’t try to be anything more. If you liked fallout 4 and skyrim odds are you’ll like this.

    • @samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Still downloading for me, but I see more than one review saying it takes a long time to get good. I’m keeping my expectations low.

      EDIT: Glad I was warned it starts slow. It does get better if you stick with it.

      EDIT 2: It entertained me for a week. It’s no Skyrim, or even Fallout. I would have been pissed if I’d paid for it.

        • Awoo [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Starfield really does look and run great.

          Run great? Absolutely not.

          I get 120fps in Elden Ring at medium, 2070, 64gb ram, i9-12900k.

          Just got done with Armored Core, rock solid 144fps at medium all the way through, never a blip.

          This runs at 30fps on lowest settings. It runs like absolute crap. It’s incredibly jarring to go from games that are gorgeous and well made with high performance to this thing running like something 20 years ago. Absolutely zero optimisation.

          It will get a seriously negative response from the average pc user when user reviews start hitting due to this performance.

          • @leftzero@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Best comparison I’ve heard (by Gopher, if I recall correctly) is Outer Worlds, but less silly, and bigger by several orders of magnitude.

    • @OptimusPrimeRib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I’ve heard nothing but good things about gameplay. But it runs like shit on most systems. A RTX 3080 at 1440p ultra can’t get 60 fps in cities.