• Tempus Fugit
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Imperialism is a strong noun. Sure they’ve benefited greatly off the back of US imperialism, but Jesus, condemn us all. It’s not like they didn’t write “Disposable Heros” or “One.” Sure they can be litigious twats, but saying they’re pro imperialism is peak brain rot.

      • @zod000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        I just assumed that Lars was controlling the rest of them like puppets through an elaborate drum kit at the back of the stage. The Metallica that wrote One is long gone.

        • Tempus Fugit
          link
          fedilink
          English
          822 hours ago

          They don’t, but am I supposed to support slander? That doesn’t sound very productive to me.

          • @MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -314 hours ago

            Go punch a Nazi. Or downvote. Maybe picket The Onion headquarters if that’s your fancy? If this “slander” holds no weight, then why are you wasting your breath here?

    • AmidFuror
      link
      fedilink
      -61 day ago

      Owning the rights to copy and distribute your own creative works = imperialism

      • @MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        421 day ago

        Rofl. Imagine thinking I called out Metallica for taking down Napster alone.

        Their shit’s been used in DoD/weapons-contractor videos for decades, and the moment the MAGAts start to turn on Trump over the Epstien stuff, Metallica is suddenly anti-drone, for the first time ever.

        Next you’ll tell us NASCAR brought down the Berlin Wall.

        • Mîm
          link
          fedilink
          English
          620 hours ago

          Next you’ll tell us NASCAR brought down the Berlin Wall.

          Wenn all know that it was the Hoff who brought that wall down!

        • Tempus Fugit
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 day ago

          And they have expressed their concerns with the military using their music in a terroristic way. - Source

          • @MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            223 hours ago

            That was twelve years ago, and “please don’t use our music for torture” is the bare minimum for people who want plausible deniability without actually doing anything about the fact that people are being tortured.

            • Tempus Fugit
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              I’m not sure what you expect from them. It should be enough that they don’t want to be a part of the machine and have spoken out against being a part of that, but you want more. Perfection is the enemy of good.

              • @MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                214 hours ago

                They are celebrities, not political candidates. “Vote Blue No Matter Who” is disingenuous when the DNC weilds it, and not even remotely applicable to rich-ass celebrities whose entire political stance is to try to be “apolitical”.

          • @MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 day ago

            Don’t confuse the awesome free service that once was with the paid brand that’s still around. Still funny all the effort and good-will Metallica wasted to go after one site when plenty of alternatives existed.

        • @otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 hours ago

          Napster programmers demographic, it seems at times! Lol

          That, and the “banned from Reddit” demographic. Two major demographics.

      • @floo@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        No, but when it came time for them to stand up for their rights, they were total dicks about it. There was a right way to handle the situation, but they chose the wrong way.

      • @bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 day ago

        Policing the speech of other people = authoritarianism, yes.

        Copyright is a government-granted (and enforced) monopoly. Under anarchy, no one would benefit from copyright protection, at least not the same way we have it now.

        People could voluntarily police their own speech to stay in an association… but I don’t know how/if that would scale.