Refaat Alareer, the teacher and writer who had shared the hardships of war with EL PAÍS, was killed along with six family members in an Israeli attack

  • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -4811 months ago

    And the Dems are already saying they’re gonna vote for Genocide Joe again…

    Hold your nose, close your eyes, turn off your brain and vote everyone!

      • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -19
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        They tell you not to support apartheid and genocide. Very difficult thing to understand indeed.

        Biden just vetoed the ceasefire.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          Biden just vetoed the ceasefire.

          Do you think Biden is in command of Israel’s military?

          • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -911 months ago

            Of course not. Israel is in charge of America’s military.

            Also if Biden voted yes then the genocide would have immediately ended.

        • @fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          A lot of countries voted no or abstained that ceasefire declaration, for good reasons.

          The U.S. had offered substantial amendments to the draft, including a condemnation of the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks that Israel says killed 1,200 people and in which 240 people were taken hostage.

          Britain’s U.N. Ambassador Barbara Woodward said her country abstained because there was no condemnation of Hamas.

          “Israel needs to be able to address the threat posed by Hamas and it needs to do so in a manner that abides by international humanitarian law so that such an attack can never be carried out again,” she told the council.

          None of these changes were made. So by some kind of logic, not condeming Hamas is more important than a humanitarian ceasefire. This is an amazing stance for an organization whose primary goal is supposed to be to work for peace on this planet.

            • @fosforus@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              How does the timeline go here? The news article is dated 2023-10-18, but this latest vote was last friday, 2023-12-08. Why didn’t this latest one have condemnation of Hamas in it if a previous one did?

              • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Because the UN realized this was just for show and it isn’t worth including and they would have to condemn israel too if they condemned Hamas.

                America is going to veto it anyways that’s the point. Trying to suck up to America is pointless.

    • @hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2111 months ago

      “At least he’s not trump” is their only response and democrats worked hard to promote fascists like him to make sure that was the only response they’ll ever need.

      • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1711 months ago

        “At least he’s not trump” is their only response

        When it’s a binary choice like that, then there’s only one option.

        • @yuriy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1511 months ago

          Almost like a two party political system is intrinsically limited to a “lesser of two evils” situation every single fucking time. Whacky.

          • Doubletwist
            link
            fedilink
            English
            511 months ago

            Well, like it or not, that’s the system we have right now, and so long as it is, by the time the main election comes around, the only options are a) violent overthrow, b) abstain from voting, or c) vote for the least bad option presented.

            I don’t think we’re quite to the point yet where violent overthrow is necessary or justified.

            Abstaining just means you accept whatever the outcome is, and thus have no leg to stand on when you don’t like the outcome.

            In my mind that leaves option c as the only valid option, with the added requirement of working in between elections towards pushing for changes in the voting system.

            I don’t pretend to be a fan of Biden. But despite his shortcomings, he’s still a damn sight better than Trump or RFK Jr. And nobody else running has a snowball’s chance in hell, and most of them are crackpots anyway. So until such a time as we have better options, I will continue to vote for the least bad option.