@BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoAI chatbots tend to choose violence and nuclear strikes in wargameswww.newscientist.comexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1222arrow-down126file-textcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldartificial_intel@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkAI chatbots tend to choose violence and nuclear strikes in wargameswww.newscientist.com@BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square59fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldartificial_intel@lemmy.ml
minus-square@SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoA human brain can do that for 20 watt of power. chatGPT uses up to 20 megawatt.
minus-square@fishos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•1 year agoYeah, and a car uses more energy than me. It still goes faster. What’s your point? The debate isn’t input vs output. It’s only about output(the ability of the AI).
A human brain can do that for 20 watt of power. chatGPT uses up to 20 megawatt.
Yeah, and a car uses more energy than me. It still goes faster. What’s your point? The debate isn’t input vs output. It’s only about output(the ability of the AI).