• BombOmOm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 years ago

    Stop buying printer ink. Buy a laser printer and buy toner instead. It’s significantly cheaper.

    • @Yendor@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      For B&W text, sure. But the quality of laser required to print a decent colour photo is not cheap.

      • @Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        It’s gotten cheaper than an inkjet DO NOT BUY AN HP!!! Brother MFC-L3710CDW $399, scanner with a page feeder, scan to USB in multiple formats (jpg, pdf, etc) scan to a network folder, straight color copy, + a color printer that never clogs or dies off because you didn’t need it for a month. Also does B&W of all of the above with just black toner.

      • @fluke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        How often does the average person really need that, though?

        Theres always ‘but sometimes’ arguments to everything, but the advice was general.

        • @coffeewithalex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Shipping labels, concert tickets, sometimes train tickets and airline tickets (some companies don’t accept them just on the phone), contracts, NDAs, tax returns, etc.

          Depends on where you live and how much you interact with other companies and government agencies.

            • @coffeewithalex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Well OK yeah, for those you just need B&W. Color becomes useful when trying to impress. I’ve sent rent applications in color specifically because I know that the real estate agents are subjective. Some of the talks that I’ve held were helped out by coloring my notes while I was presenting. And some home crafts and activities (escape rooms with friends) were helped out several times by the color printer. Given that there isn’t a huge price gap in maintenance and initial costs, for me it was worth it.

              Also, neither the OP nor the comment I was replying to mentioned anything about color. I was specifying stuff about printers in general.

              • @Bazoogle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Lol, the comment thread you replied to is literally talking about color printers. The person you replied to said “How often does the average person really need that” with the ‘that’ being in reference to printing in color. Then you listed a bunch of stuff that doesn’t need color

              • @fluke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 years ago

                The comment I replied to did being up the topic of colour though, just read the thread.

                My response to that is that the average person doesn’t need colour printing, and honestly doesn’t even need to print at all with rare exception.

                Based on your replies you are not the average person in terms of printer usage. So that’s why you had the responses that you’ve had. You’re just seeming to look for an excuse to argue?

              • @nodiet@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Yes, you were. The comment you responded to was asking whether coloured printing is all that necessary in response to someone saying that while b&w laser printers may be cheap, colour ones aren’t.

      • @ydkm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -22 years ago

        The laser doesn’t print anything. I haven’t taken apart a home printer but I assume it works the same as the smaller machines I fix. The laser charges the drum. That puts the image on the drum by attracting toner. Then the paper rolls over the drum. I skipped some steps but that’s the general idea.

        The point is the laser just has to be good to charge the drum.

        • @Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          It’s quite common to leave out the noun when everyone knows what everyone’s talking about. In this case when someone says “An inkjet is worse than a laser”, we know they’re not talking about the actual jets or lasers

    • @AccidentalLemming@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      It has a significantly higher upfront cost though. So not that interesting for low volumes.

      That’s probably what they’re probably counting on to keep the ink business alive.

      • @sygnius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        A laser printer is actually better for low volume printing. With ink cartridges, they dry up if you don’t use them within a year and will need to be replaced.

        I’ve had my laser printer for about 12 years now, and only replaced the drum once since I print so little. Also, I have a Brother printer, which was roughly around $50 at the time.

        • Species8472
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          This is great wisdom. Brother printers are very cheap and 3rd party consumables moreso.

          • @luckystarr@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Just block them from accessing the internet. They tend to auto-update their firmware and then some 3rd party cartridges will suddenly stop working.

      • @ccunix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        You can get a little Brother laser with network and duplexing for the same price as a cheap inkjet. It will be much cheaper to run and the ink never dries out. We do that and have an HP Envy with the Instant Ink free tier (10 pages per month with no rollover).