@black0ut@pawb.social to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoThey had a paid break, right?pawb.socialimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1imageThey had a paid break, right?pawb.social@black0ut@pawb.social to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-square@Gork@lemm.eelinkfedilink18•1 year agoAt least with your assembly code it’ll go brrrrrrrt because of how fast it’ll be.
minus-square@noddy@beehaw.orglinkfedilink24•1 year agoIt will go brrrrrrrt¤gdføTJwrgt65&<)5½$¥[[¥½{2ahgfh Segmentation fault (core dumped)
minus-squareℍ𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕞𝕪linkfedilink9•1 year agoI always have problems with assembly. Especially after being at Ikea.
minus-square@MonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilink2•1 year agoA pal in tech school did code golf in assembly. There are people like that.
minus-square@30p87@feddit.delinkfedilink10•1 year agoIf you know that you do. What you probably do not. A proper C/C++ compiler (gcc) will almost always produce better/more optimized ASM than a human ever could.
minus-square@UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink7•1 year agoit reaches ‘t’ from ‘b’ with a lot less iterations of ‘r’. It seems to me that you have a more optimized version. :)
At least with your assembly code it’ll go brrrrrrrt because of how fast it’ll be.
It will go brrrrrrrt¤gdføTJwrgt65&<)5½$¥[[¥½{2ahgfh Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Assuming it actually works
I always have problems with assembly. Especially after being at Ikea.
A pal in tech school did code golf in assembly. There are people like that.
If you know that you do. What you probably do not. A proper C/C++ compiler (gcc) will almost always produce better/more optimized ASM than a human ever could.
My assembly code only goes brt :(
it reaches ‘t’ from ‘b’ with a lot less iterations of ‘r’. It seems to me that you have a more optimized version. :)
Maybe you switched up
jgandjl?/s