@Clbull@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoBlizzard locks you out of account if you don't agree to new terms; no ownership, forced arbitrationyoutu.beexternal-linkmessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1911arrow-down115
arrow-up1896arrow-down1external-linkBlizzard locks you out of account if you don't agree to new terms; no ownership, forced arbitrationyoutu.be@Clbull@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-square@IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish19•1 year agoWhich shouldn’t be allowed in relation to consumer goods and services.
minus-square@Telodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish-17•1 year agoMeh, arbitration is cheaper and faster than actual litigation. I see clear advantages for both parties.
minus-squareBezierlinkfedilinkEnglish18•edit-21 year agoBut also obvious disadvantages to the customer in cases like this. Why should the customer not have a right to refuse?
Which shouldn’t be allowed in relation to consumer goods and services.
Meh, arbitration is cheaper and faster than actual litigation. I see clear advantages for both parties.
But also obvious disadvantages to the customer in cases like this. Why should the customer not have a right to refuse?