• @cartmancarter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    So is the largest contributor to the problem just lack of land? Seems like most of the other problems from the article can be solved with money, but a lack of land makes it hard to build anything

    • @jochem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      I once calculated that if we reduce the land use for livestock by 50% and then use 10% of the newly freed land to build housing (the other 40% can become nature), we can build a city something like 1.5x times the size of Amsterdam, the largest city in the Netherlands.

      It’s not a lack of land. It’s how the land is being used. Almost half is for livestock (or more accurate: to dump the shit of that livestock, as the majority of the animals is kept indoors).

      • @cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Is the land the livestock are currently using capable of supporting dense housing and is it close to urban cores. Or would you just build sky scrapers in the middle of nowhere, because China tried that and it failed.

        • @rbhfd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Anything in the Netherlands is close to an urban core.

          They also have centuries of experience on building on lands that shouldn’t be capable of supporting dense housing. Amsterdam used to be a literal swamp as well (I’m not making any statements on its current status).

          • @rsn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Haha I like your disclaimer, as it was indeed very inviting to reply with a “still a swamp” :)

        • @rbhfd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          The Netherlands exports an enormous amount of meat currently. It’s the largest exporter of meat of any EU country. They export 60% of the meat they produce. So yeah, they would be fine.

          The Netherlands is currently really suffering from nitrogen pollution, in a big part because of the meat industry. So it would also be a great improvement for the environment to reduce the meat production.

          Having such a big part of the European meat production localized in one of the most populated regions in the EU is just a recipe for disaster.

        • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Livestock are incredibly inefficient at producing food. If you use a small fraction of the land to grow crops there will be plenty to eat.

        • @rsn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Less food”? What are you talking about? Most of the land used for livestock is for exported meat. Also, meat is an incredibly unsustainable source of food.

    • @__lb__@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      I think the three biggest contributors are:

      • immigration
      • nitrogen crisis not allowing to have as many houses built as we need
      • seniors living at home longer instead of going to a nursing home
      • Ronno
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Nope, our spoil isn’t dense enough for it. We cannot build higher then what you see in Rotterdam, because the building would just fall over

    • @Rob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      It doesn’t help, but there are a few factors that are more limiting right now. Labour shortage is one, as are nitrogen emissions. A lot of developers also find the current building costs too high.

      There are plenty of plots that can be built on, with all of the paperwork good to go.