@mafbar@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoBell curve of text editorslemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down128file-text
arrow-up173arrow-down1imageBell curve of text editorslemmy.world@mafbar@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square41fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNetto Hikarilinkfedilink3•2 years agoI like both. But many people don’t even realize that nano has quite a lot of configuration options. To me, they’re text editors, not code editors. For code, I use VSCode (or “code”, the FOSS variant).
minus-square@PlexSheep@feddit.delinkfedilink3•2 years agoI have never heard of customisation for nano. That said, I’m quite pleased with programming my vim how I like it.
minus-square@Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.mlBlinkfedilink2•edit-22 years agoYes, but for a quick edit or glance, nano-syntax-highlight and lesspipe with highlight or bat are nice.
minus-squaredream_weasellinkfedilink2•2 years agoTreesitter and native LSP levels the playing field pretty handily IMO.
I like both. But many people don’t even realize that nano has quite a lot of configuration options. To me, they’re text editors, not code editors. For code, I use VSCode (or “code”, the FOSS variant).
I have never heard of customisation for nano. That said, I’m quite pleased with programming my vim how I like it.
/etc/nanorcYes, but for a quick edit or glance, nano-syntax-highlight and lesspipe with highlight or bat are nice.
Treesitter and native LSP levels the playing field pretty handily IMO.