@EfreetSK@lemmy.world to Gaming@beehaw.orgEnglish • 2 years agoMicrosoft says the 2-3 year development cycles of big-budget games are overwww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up1170arrow-down10
arrow-up1170arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft says the 2-3 year development cycles of big-budget games are overwww.axios.com@EfreetSK@lemmy.world to Gaming@beehaw.orgEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square111fedilink
minus-square@thegameoverguy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish22•2 years agoI just want to know why everything has to be open world today. It seems like developers are just constantly increasing scope and making games almost too big now.
minus-square@Lund3@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglish14•2 years agoI can assure you it’s not the developers changing the scope…
minus-square@bigpphaver@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoEasier level design. I wouldn’t be surprised if 99% of open world games just had their landscape generated and then slightly tweaked afterwards.
I just want to know why everything has to be open world today. It seems like developers are just constantly increasing scope and making games almost too big now.
I can assure you it’s not the developers changing the scope…
Easier level design. I wouldn’t be surprised if 99% of open world games just had their landscape generated and then slightly tweaked afterwards.