Fanaticus
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months ago

Vote!

lemmy.ml

message-square
96
fedilink
245

Vote!

lemmy.ml

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months ago
message-square
96
fedilink
  • Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    7•8 months ago

    Sounds like you need to read theory and history. Marxists have advocated for democratic organizational structures for centuries.

    • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      -5•8 months ago

      But they don’t actually put it in place because of the pressures during a revolution.

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        6•8 months ago

        Pressures on the system from destabilization are threats of revolution, hence revolutionary pressure.

        • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          -4•8 months ago

          Do you think a democratic bureaucratic fully checked and balanced revolution would succeed in overthrowing the structure?

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            5•8 months ago

            Has before and will again.

            • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              -2•8 months ago

              Examples?

              • Cowbee [he/they]
                link
                fedilink
                7•8 months ago

                USSR, Cuba, PRC, etc. Read theory and read history books. You’re interested in neither though.

                • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -6•
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  USSR and PRC had really bad checks and balances since they let dictators consolidate power and form cults of personality. You really think those are good examples of your point? Have you read entirely different histories than I have? Which books do you recommend then?

                  • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/its, she/her, fae/faer, love/loves, null/void, des/pair, none/use name]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    8•
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    I was going to say something like This Soviet World or Russian Justice, but they are not actually history books. They are written from a contemporary standpoint. Pat Sloans Soviet Democracy is another contemporary book.

                    I’m sure cowbee will link you to Blackshirts and reds, that is a history book.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    7•
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    The USSR and PRC did not have dictatorships, this is a misunderstanding of the Soviet structure and the concept of the Mass Line. Not even the CIA believed the USSR to be a dictatorship. The USSR had a more democratic structure than the US:

                    I recommend reading, among the other books linked, Blackshirts and Reds.

Memes@lemmy.ml

!memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
  • 639 users / day
  • 3.77K users / week
  • 9.23K users / month
  • 23.2K users / 6 months
  • 50.3K subscribers
  • 13.9K Posts
  • 293K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop
  • @sexy_peach@feddit.de
  • Cyclohexane
  • Arthur Besse
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org