• @gavi@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    612 years ago

    Admin from LemmyNSFW here, not the one that posted but an admin nonetheless.

    I’m not really down with this being presented as drama as some are trying to, it’s unfortunate the way it played out but overall its their choice to defederate. We actively encourage other instances who forbid pornography to defederate from us. Lemmy.ml, sopuli, etc etc we are totally fine with, we have no malice or hate towards them because thats their choice and their reasons and concerns for doing so are more than legitimate especially with how limited lemmy is right now and the locations that they host their site at. We have open discussions with other instance admins and welcome discussions of their potential concerns, it’s just we didn’t really know what the concerns were beyond “this looks wrong because it looks wrong delete it” which made it extremely frustrating to try to figure out concisely what the problem was so we could address it.

    My only issue is it being presented as if we are fine with CSAM, when we aren’t and to be accused of that is extremely serious.

    • @marmo7ade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Let me guess: pornography of legal adults was being considered CSAM? Because 20 year olds make some prudes self-conscious. I got banned from a reddit sub for pointing out that Belle Delphine is 23 years old because a woman wanted to divorce her husband for watching Belle porn, because she is a child, according to the wife. Yea these people exist.

    • Betty White In HDOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      My only issue is it being presented as if we are fine with CSAM, when we aren’t and to be accused of that is extremely serious.

      She’s still doing it!

      I acted on the report I received, which wasn’t for the jailbait community.

      There is no jailbait community on lemmynsfw as far as I can tell. Jailbait is by definition underage girls and falls under CSAM and you can have your own thoughts about fauxbait, I absolutely do, but the fact of the matter is the whole point is that it’s fake and these are adult women.

      There’s some inherent reality/fantasy disconnect that Ada has here.

      I’m not really down with this being presented as drama as some are trying to

      I know and I appreciate you taking a mature and reasonable stance on all this and my point in posting this here wasn’t to make something out of nothing or create outrage or anything like that. It’s just that this isn’t nothing, it looks like there might be ulterior motives and reasons that were not made clear here and this was just an excuse and a lot of this just reeks of goofy Leddit powermod behavior and logic that doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. That’s all.

      • @gavi@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        It makes me sad, but it is what it is. I’m trying not to take it personally, but it does sting since I am a gay man, and an LGBT focused instance is a lovely idea in my eyes. We do not have a jailbait community, whatsoever. There are concerns about fauxbait that we are actively discussing and navigating. It did bring up a good conversation on that end at least.

    • U de Recife
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I really want to thank you for the levelheadedness you’re bringing in.

      Perhaps that’s a learned behaviour from other networks where drama=engagement=upvotes. I don’t know. But reading your comment filled me with gratitude.

      It’s reassuring to see these technicalities being taken for what they are. Different people have different needs. Understanding that makes respecting those needs something simple and natural. Each to their own, right?

      tl; dr?

      Thank you for your levelheadedness.

      • @gavi@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I know it may seem like empty platitudes, but I want to make it clear for anyone reading this that our entire team agrees with more native ways in lemmy to block our instance as well as ways for instances to limit our content from federating into the all page. The fact that there is a lack of distinction between NSFW and pornographic content is extremely problematic as well, and ideally long term lemmy will receive content warnings like other activitypub platforms.

        Porn isn’t for everyone, but people are going to seek it out regardless. A space such as lemmyNSFW needs to exist to allow the people who seek such content out to be able to do so in a safe and controlled environment that focuses consent as a key principle. And in line with having the key princple being consent, making sure people who do not want to see content from our instance are able to block such content with ease is a no brainer.

        Our team has also taken a step back and looked to what critiques there are in regard to our instance, as well as preemptively engaging with other instance admins as well. The conversations being had are important, and we are actively figuring out how to best navigate them.

        Also, for those who may have difficulty believing in this position, heres a reply I made 20 days ago to the connect apps comm when a proposal was made to block instances. https://lemmy.ca/comment/857085

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        So, first, just turn off “show NSFW” in your profile settings, but yes, even then I agree there really needs to be a way for users to block instances. Defederating is such a massive thing. Having more granular options would be nice. I don’t think it would’ve changed this particular case but it can change more.

      • Yeather
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Switch to lemmy.blajah.zone and you’ll never see them again.