SSTF to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 2 years agoWhat inaccurate historical factoid do you just go with?message-square73fedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down14
arrow-up145arrow-down1message-squareWhat inaccurate historical factoid do you just go with?SSTF to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 2 years agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-square@contextual_somebody@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•2 years ago1.67 Meters https://www.history.com/news/napoleon-complex-short
minus-square@Oderus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 years agoI wonder why the height differs so much between sites?
minus-square@contextual_somebody@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•2 years agoUsually I’m a huge champion of Wikipedia, but my guess is someone on Wikipedia not accurately converting between archaic French inches/metric/imperial
1.67 Meters
https://www.history.com/news/napoleon-complex-short
I wonder why the height differs so much between sites?
Usually I’m a huge champion of Wikipedia, but my guess is someone on Wikipedia not accurately converting between archaic French inches/metric/imperial