• hoodatninja
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The OLED switch was nice, but it’s what the switch should’ve been from day one.

    The processor was long in the tooth and the joycons were unacceptably flawed on day one. The OLED switch changed none of these things and it still frustrates me a lot that people weren’t more critical of it tbh.

    • @Yondu_the_Ravager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Yeah they’d fill should’ve upgraded the processor for the OLED switch, and I totally agree about the joycon situation. I was more talking about the screen, Nintendo easily could’ve made the first Gen switch OLED but they didn’t.

      • hoodatninja
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I feel the price was already a little high at launch (since they are adamant about making a profit on hardware as opposed to Sony/Microsoft who sell at a loss) so the addition of a more expensive screen would’ve probably pushed the price too high tbh. It was 2017, OLED’s were still pretty new and very expensive.

      • @mindbleach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        LCD was fine. Locked 60 Hz refresh rate made no sense whatsoever. Even shitty laptops can dip down to 40 Hz, and that’d make dodgy framerates less stuttery. But the Switch is Nvidia hardware. There’s no excuse to not at least support 120 Hz polling to flip framebuffers.