@mondoman712@lemmy.ml to Fuck Cars@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agoGeometry hates carslemmy.mlimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1446arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up1430arrow-down1imageGeometry hates carslemmy.ml@mondoman712@lemmy.ml to Fuck Cars@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square34fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@mondoman712@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilink104•edit-22 years agoBut this is what happens. Every rush hour the roads are packed with cars, mostly just with one person in them, while the trains are actually full.
minus-squarePonyOfWarlinkfedilink37•2 years agoDuring rush hour you definitely won’t have a distance of 10 meters between each car though.
minus-square@mondoman712@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilink30•2 years agoIf they’re moving there should be, and if not it doesn’t seem fair to me to compare transport to a car park.
minus-square@MonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilink4•edit-22 years agoTrue. The usual traffic congestion has 2 - 3 meters.
minus-square@pkulak@beehaw.orglinkfedilink3•2 years agoSure, but only because they aren’t moving. It should be about the distance traveled in a couple seconds. Less then that and you get a lot of wrecks, so brand new problems.
But this is what happens. Every rush hour the roads are packed with cars, mostly just with one person in them, while the trains are actually full.
During rush hour you definitely won’t have a distance of 10 meters between each car though.
If they’re moving there should be, and if not it doesn’t seem fair to me to compare transport to a car park.
True. The usual traffic congestion has 2 - 3 meters.
Sure, but only because they aren’t moving. It should be about the distance traveled in a couple seconds. Less then that and you get a lot of wrecks, so brand new problems.