Kewbit, if you look at my previous response, I gave you the benefit of the doubt and encouraged you to get an emotionally intelligent friend to tell your side of the story. If this is the response, it’s clear that whether or not you were sincere about completing Haveno mobile and whether or not you wished to scam, you’re far too petty an immature to work on the CSS, so the CSS was correct in its decision to close the CSS. It is a pity since Haveno mobile is a much needed part of the XMR ecosystem and I hope someone completes it.
As for BasicSwapDEX, the code is finicky and is difficult to install but it does what it says it does. It needs a lot of improving for the newbie to get right but it does work and it does have liquidity. I’d say it’s about six months away from being as competitive as Haveno, and its potential for automation makes it a worthy part of the XMR ecosystem. If BasicSwapDEX mobile could ever be developed, it would be even more competitive.
Whatever dude, doesn’t say anything in the CCS rules about being mature, I make software, I get paid, quite simple but core couldn’t pull it off so far, last chance next community meeting or else I’ll just do my own thing with it give it a little twist and make it better, will still ultimately release something but unless the community is willing to complain to the core team that I haven’t been paid it won’t be FOSS by default, it’ll just be whatever I want cause I’ll essentially be doing it for fun when bored in my spare time , there is plenty of evidence out there if you merely search. Couldn’t care less about emotionally intelligent people or not. Pay up or fuck up basically. So sick of responding to people who can’t see through a blatant scam, yeah I’m immature get fucking used to it doesn’t mean it’s cool to just start scamming cunts does it? Fuckwit.
@Kewbit@g2devi you are choosing the wrong comunity to use a non foss… From.what I am seeing here I would not put my coins in a software compiled by you…
It’s not non-foss, but it is withheld foss, just like Luigi1111 withheld our funds from release despite having open sourced and made publicly available the most recent milestone.
In defence to this, I didn’t respect the rules, that’s doesn’t mean the rules are fair, their are favoured towards the common tend of scams Luigi1111 pulls of to claim CSS and Bounty funds fraudulently even when work is completed. There is sufficenient evidence the work was though, finally completed as requested yet the milestone payout was refused, therefore, there is now a split team from core. Our team works more on the actual app being usable outside of a desktop environment, which is tremendously more useful, it’s still FOSS, it’s no loss to the community at all actually, everything that’s promised is still intended to be delivered, this will be clearer soon. However we are withholding code now just as the monero core team have withholded funds, just so that we take precendence we we release our hard work, since I’m now working with some members of the Tor project and Tail development team, who have a very good reputation, upon release you’ll firstly find it’s all open source and available to use to connect or create any network in a federated and decentralised manner, very easily. This is not possible with the classic haveno development, but we give credit to woodser for he efforts and should our project recieve any donations he will for sure be included as a 30% benefactor. Our work is being completed at https://haveno.com/ rather than https://haveno.exchange/ (which we use some of code from on desktop, not mobile), which is an important distinction, this is perhaps part of the reason the Monero core team decided not to pay our milestone, because we started to gain precedence for our work outside of the scope of the CCS and were threatened of losing market share for internal competing projects they are running such as BasicSwapDEX.com which despite being useless is somehow listed on getmonero.org as a link, weird huh? If you don’t think that’s strange especially after the fact I’ll admit the SeraiDEX, is better than what we are working on, that should for sure be listed on getmonero.org but is subject to significant scrutiny despite clearly being a better codebase than basicswapdex.com. The reason I mention this so randomly is the Luigi1111 is involved in these CCS fund laundering schemes just as he was when he stole 2000 XMR from the General Fund (the main reason fluffypony decided to petition disband core) because let’s be real, he doesn’t need to steal fund. So while yes there are speculations as to why perhaps I should not receive the remaining CSS bounty as promised, we ultimately still did and are still doing the work. So if it’s really the community that want’s this they should stick with us and not against us, either way we know the value provided by our team will be useful enough the whether you like us or hate us you’ll still prefer using out product overall, just the same way to use your fiat banks or Binance, we’re just trying to make finance a better subject for everyone, that’s really it.
When you sign a contract with a client that asks you to do something, you either do it in the ways described by the contract, or you don’t and don’t get paid. You have no say in how you should work.
Find the rules unfair? Don’t apply to CCS then.
You don’t have to say anything more. You’re in the wrong. You lied, you didn’t fulfilf your promises. That’s it.
Kewbit, if you look at my previous response, I gave you the benefit of the doubt and encouraged you to get an emotionally intelligent friend to tell your side of the story. If this is the response, it’s clear that whether or not you were sincere about completing Haveno mobile and whether or not you wished to scam, you’re far too petty an immature to work on the CSS, so the CSS was correct in its decision to close the CSS. It is a pity since Haveno mobile is a much needed part of the XMR ecosystem and I hope someone completes it.
As for BasicSwapDEX, the code is finicky and is difficult to install but it does what it says it does. It needs a lot of improving for the newbie to get right but it does work and it does have liquidity. I’d say it’s about six months away from being as competitive as Haveno, and its potential for automation makes it a worthy part of the XMR ecosystem. If BasicSwapDEX mobile could ever be developed, it would be even more competitive.
Whatever dude, doesn’t say anything in the CCS rules about being mature, I make software, I get paid, quite simple but core couldn’t pull it off so far, last chance next community meeting or else I’ll just do my own thing with it give it a little twist and make it better, will still ultimately release something but unless the community is willing to complain to the core team that I haven’t been paid it won’t be FOSS by default, it’ll just be whatever I want cause I’ll essentially be doing it for fun when bored in my spare time , there is plenty of evidence out there if you merely search. Couldn’t care less about emotionally intelligent people or not. Pay up or fuck up basically. So sick of responding to people who can’t see through a blatant scam, yeah I’m immature get fucking used to it doesn’t mean it’s cool to just start scamming cunts does it? Fuckwit.
@Kewbit @g2devi you are choosing the wrong comunity to use a non foss… From.what I am seeing here I would not put my coins in a software compiled by you…
It’s not non-foss, but it is withheld foss, just like Luigi1111 withheld our funds from release despite having open sourced and made publicly available the most recent milestone.
You publish source and respect the rules, you get paid. Easy, right?
Yet you didn’t publish the source and didn’t respect the rules, so don’t complain you didn’t get paid.
In defence to this, I didn’t respect the rules, that’s doesn’t mean the rules are fair, their are favoured towards the common tend of scams Luigi1111 pulls of to claim CSS and Bounty funds fraudulently even when work is completed. There is sufficenient evidence the work was though, finally completed as requested yet the milestone payout was refused, therefore, there is now a split team from core. Our team works more on the actual app being usable outside of a desktop environment, which is tremendously more useful, it’s still FOSS, it’s no loss to the community at all actually, everything that’s promised is still intended to be delivered, this will be clearer soon. However we are withholding code now just as the monero core team have withholded funds, just so that we take precendence we we release our hard work, since I’m now working with some members of the Tor project and Tail development team, who have a very good reputation, upon release you’ll firstly find it’s all open source and available to use to connect or create any network in a federated and decentralised manner, very easily. This is not possible with the classic haveno development, but we give credit to woodser for he efforts and should our project recieve any donations he will for sure be included as a 30% benefactor. Our work is being completed at https://haveno.com/ rather than https://haveno.exchange/ (which we use some of code from on desktop, not mobile), which is an important distinction, this is perhaps part of the reason the Monero core team decided not to pay our milestone, because we started to gain precedence for our work outside of the scope of the CCS and were threatened of losing market share for internal competing projects they are running such as BasicSwapDEX.com which despite being useless is somehow listed on getmonero.org as a link, weird huh? If you don’t think that’s strange especially after the fact I’ll admit the SeraiDEX, is better than what we are working on, that should for sure be listed on getmonero.org but is subject to significant scrutiny despite clearly being a better codebase than basicswapdex.com. The reason I mention this so randomly is the Luigi1111 is involved in these CCS fund laundering schemes just as he was when he stole 2000 XMR from the General Fund (the main reason fluffypony decided to petition disband core) because let’s be real, he doesn’t need to steal fund. So while yes there are speculations as to why perhaps I should not receive the remaining CSS bounty as promised, we ultimately still did and are still doing the work. So if it’s really the community that want’s this they should stick with us and not against us, either way we know the value provided by our team will be useful enough the whether you like us or hate us you’ll still prefer using out product overall, just the same way to use your fiat banks or Binance, we’re just trying to make finance a better subject for everyone, that’s really it.
When you sign a contract with a client that asks you to do something, you either do it in the ways described by the contract, or you don’t and don’t get paid. You have no say in how you should work.
Find the rules unfair? Don’t apply to CCS then.
You don’t have to say anything more. You’re in the wrong. You lied, you didn’t fulfilf your promises. That’s it.