Doug HollandM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoProblem solved.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square271fedilinkarrow-up1727arrow-down141
arrow-up1686arrow-down1imageProblem solved.lemmy.worldDoug HollandM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square271fedilink
minus-square@ramble81@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish22•2 months agoYou can have islands that belong to countries, why not land locked enclaves! (Yes I under logistics and such)
minus-square@Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish12•2 months agoWhat if we just take the empty parts of WY and MT to connect CO?
minus-square@lars@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglish7•2 months ago empty parts of WY and MT is redundant 😊
minus-square@joostjakob@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish11•2 months agoPlenty of countries have those. There’s even exclaves within enclaves.
You can have islands that belong to countries, why not land locked enclaves! (Yes I under logistics and such)
What if we just take the empty parts of WY and MT to connect CO?
is redundant 😊
Plenty of countries have those. There’s even exclaves within enclaves.
The City and the City