@squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-22 months agoStock photo for the Fediverse by Elena Rossinidiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1602arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1591arrow-down1imageStock photo for the Fediverse by Elena Rossinidiscuss.tchncs.de@squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-22 months agomessage-square55fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareUlrichlinkfedilinkEnglish28•2 months agoBecause it’s brand new and will eventually federate. The developer is deep in the fediverse so 100% it will
minus-squareUlrichlinkfedilinkEnglish8•2 months agoIt’s really not a technicality to get worked up about.
minus-squarekatlinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoI disagree. Anybody that joins Loops right now is forced to the one instance. That’s not federation. That’s not an issue for you. Which is valid. But you don’t get to police those who don’t share your view.
minus-squareUlrichlinkfedilinkEnglish5•2 months agoNobody is “policing” anyone, I just don’t think it’s a valid argument.
minus-squareUlrichlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 months agoI don’t think you understand what that word means.
minus-square@underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoThey’ve done federation on a few test posts, but it’s definitely not there yet for normal users to use.
Because it’s brand new and will eventually federate. The developer is deep in the fediverse so 100% it will
But right now it doesn’t…
It’s really not a technicality to get worked up about.
I disagree. Anybody that joins Loops right now is forced to the one instance. That’s not federation. That’s not an issue for you. Which is valid. But you don’t get to police those who don’t share your view.
Nobody is “policing” anyone, I just don’t think it’s a valid argument.
The irony
I don’t think you understand what that word means.
Sure
They’ve done federation on a few test posts, but it’s definitely not there yet for normal users to use.