Fubarberry to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agoCombining two different internet debatessopuli.xyzimagemessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up1674arrow-down116
arrow-up1658arrow-down1imageCombining two different internet debatessopuli.xyzFubarberry to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square141fedilink
minus-square@Player2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilink54•2 years agoPortal would fail due to being placed on moving object
minus-squareinsomniac_lemonlinkfedilink6•edit-22 years agoWhy the /s? It’s true. Obviously it makes for simpler puzzle design plus was easier to ignore the full capability (even the version in 2 seems to just work enough to allow the set-piece), so it seems silly to use developer limitation as a gotcha.
Portal would fail due to being placed on moving object
Except for that one section in Portal 2 /s
Why the
/s?It’s true. Obviously it makes for simpler puzzle design plus was easier to ignore the full capability (even the version in 2 seems to just work enough to allow the set-piece), so it seems silly to use developer limitation as a gotcha.