Summary
Trump is pushing for softer language on Russia’s war in Ukraine, straining G7 unity.
Officials say the U.S. is blocking references to “Russian aggression” and prefers calling it the “Ukraine conflict.”
This shift follows Trump’s peace talks with Putin that excluded Ukraine’s President Zelensky, whom Trump later called a “dictator.”
The change in rhetoric contrasts with Biden-era support for Ukraine and threatens a unified G7 stance.
In our system the votes get counted to figure out who won so the non-voters said they are okay with what’s happening.
So the non-voters all have future sight and can already see that Trump will win? Maybe what they actually thought was that neither side will actually help them and they are not informed enough to know that Trump will win without their help, have you ever thought about that? Seems all you actually care about is helping the oligarchy, so maybe you don’t even care to think.
Hey there’s no need to be getting personal just because you don’t agree with me.
Not voting means you support whoever wins, that’s all I’m saying.
I’m not being personal, I’m simply stating that insisting to push that agenda makes you a supporter of oligarchy. Attacking non-voters won’t make them want to vote more, it makes them disassociate even more from politics, which is exactly what the oligarchs want, so you can go ahead and prove your support for Trump’s takeover by continuing to help his cause.
Non voters aren’t worth going after.
The liberals will still keep voting so the DNC should ignore the left that have already abandoned them and go after the moderate right instead.
At least they consistently vote.
Like what they did in this election? How did that work out for them?
The liberal candidate barely lost while the progressive candidate didn’t even get a million votes.
What progressive candidate? I didn’t know the Dems even considered a progressive candidate?
Oh, did you mean Jill Stein? So you consider her a progressive candidate now? What happened to all the Dems calling her a Russian asset?
Funny how people like you count her as a progressive candidate when you want to attack progressives, but dismiss her completely whenever people are talking about alternatives to Kamala.
Would you rather talk about Rachele Fruit from the Socialist Workers Party’s total of 4,225 votes?
She only needed 77,298,355 more votes to beat Trump!