• @misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      It doesn’t try to cater to everyone and there might be controversial design choices. This can mean anything from something great and ahead of time to absolute horrors of user interface design [link removed] depending on your perspective and a particular app in question. I really like what Photon does and how polished it is but it’s definitely not for me.

        • unalivejoy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          That 5.0 out of 5 (1 Rating) seems a bit suspicious. You should leave a review to make it more accurate.

          • @misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            813 days ago

            Eh, don’t bully some random developer that created an app few people like. It was made for weirdos and those weirdos must appreciate having their own app.

          • @Dil@is.hardlywork.ing
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 days ago

            Its useful for ppl who like it, me not liking it is more of a personal preference, it didnt have any issues other than my subjective opinion

    • Xylight
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 days ago

      It means that design choices and features I implement will follow what I believe to be optimal. I still try to consider what the users think, but the overall organization will prioritize my thought. It sounds narcissistic, but other software often follows this pattern.

      It’s why Photon will rarely implement random features if I deem it to be something left to another tool, because my opinion is that it should remain simple unless the feature will significantly improve the user experience.