@Pr0x1mo@lemmy.world to Leopards Ate My Face@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-29 days agoWhen i vote R, i didn't think voting for conservatism would conserve to a time before gay marriagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down119file-text
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageWhen i vote R, i didn't think voting for conservatism would conserve to a time before gay marriagelemmy.world@Pr0x1mo@lemmy.world to Leopards Ate My Face@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-29 days agomessage-square194fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@missandry351@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•8 days agoWhat are those? I only know Roe is for abortion.
minus-square@SaltyBarDog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•7 days agoObergefell allowed gay marriage. Obergefell v. Hodges 2015 https://www.wlns.com/news/resolution-introduced-to-overturn-obergefell-v-hodges/ Lawrence is sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Lawrence v. Texas 2003 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/thomas-wants-supreme-court-overturn-landmark-rulings-legalized-contrac-rcna35228 Griswold is right to use contraception. Griswold v. Connecticut 1965 Loving got rid of anti-miscegenation laws. Loving v. Virginia 1967 https://pwperspective.com/republican-senator-suggests-supreme-court-should-reconsider-loving-v-virginia/
minus-square@SwingingTheLamp@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish7•8 days agoObergefell v. Hodges: Same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry. Lawrence v. Texas: Anti-sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Griswold v. Connecticut: Opposite-sex couples have a Constitutional right to privacy and contraception. Loving v. Virginia: Bans on interracial marriage are unconstitutional.
minus-square@HaveMeOnYourPodcast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-28 days agoObergefell is same-sex marriage, Lawrence overturned sodomy laws making gay sex legal, Griswold was legalizing contraception, and Loving was interracial marriage.
What are those? I only know Roe is for abortion.
Obergefell allowed gay marriage. Obergefell v. Hodges 2015 https://www.wlns.com/news/resolution-introduced-to-overturn-obergefell-v-hodges/ Lawrence is sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Lawrence v. Texas 2003 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/thomas-wants-supreme-court-overturn-landmark-rulings-legalized-contrac-rcna35228 Griswold is right to use contraception. Griswold v. Connecticut 1965 Loving got rid of anti-miscegenation laws. Loving v. Virginia 1967 https://pwperspective.com/republican-senator-suggests-supreme-court-should-reconsider-loving-v-virginia/
Obergefell v. Hodges: Same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry.
Lawrence v. Texas: Anti-sodomy laws are unconstitutional.
Griswold v. Connecticut: Opposite-sex couples have a Constitutional right to privacy and contraception.
Loving v. Virginia: Bans on interracial marriage are unconstitutional.
Obergefell is same-sex marriage, Lawrence overturned sodomy laws making gay sex legal, Griswold was legalizing contraception, and Loving was interracial marriage.
deleted by creator