GhostalmediaM to Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 days agoMarc Rober shows why Tesla's camera-only self-driving system is dangerouswww.youtube.commessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1428arrow-down114
arrow-up1414arrow-down1external-linkMarc Rober shows why Tesla's camera-only self-driving system is dangerouswww.youtube.comGhostalmediaM to Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 days agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareUlrichlinkfedilinkEnglish17•3 days agoNot any tangible difference in this scenario. Both use vision only. And both use the same computers.
minus-square@sir_pronoun@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 days agoBut do they use a different software? Maybe FSD is more advanced than autopilot and could have reacted better? Just playing devil’s advocate here.
minus-square@undefinedValue@programming.devlinkfedilink6•2 days agoThe software may change but these tests show it’s the hardware that’s limiting them. If the Tesla can’t see a kid through fog, it doesn’t matter what software you pick, that kid gunna die.
minus-squareUlrichlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 days agoYes, completely different software, but both are limited by machine vision.
minus-square@toolverine@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•2 days agoHuman drivers generally use sound as well.
minus-squareUlrichlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 days agoFortunately humans have much better hardware and software to accompany that vision.
minus-square@RickC137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•edit-22 days agoFSD hard and software has just to be good enough for the job. And still we cause so many deaths because we are tired, distracted or emotional when driving.
minus-squareUlrichlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 days ago FSD hard and software has just to be good enough for the job. But…it’s not.
minus-square@RickC137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 days agoBased on? Have you seen the progress in users YouTube videos? It’s not there yet but I don’t see how it can’t work with vision only. It just has to be safer than human drivers.
minus-squareUlrichlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 days ago Based on? The fact that both systems are vision only, as I said previously. Have you seen the progress in users YouTube videos? Even better, I used it myself. For 3 months. It’s awful.
Not any tangible difference in this scenario. Both use vision only. And both use the same computers.
But do they use a different software? Maybe FSD is more advanced than autopilot and could have reacted better?
Just playing devil’s advocate here.
The software may change but these tests show it’s the hardware that’s limiting them. If the Tesla can’t see a kid through fog, it doesn’t matter what software you pick, that kid gunna die.
Yes, completely different software, but both are limited by machine vision.
Human drivers use vision only
Human drivers generally use sound as well.
Fortunately humans have much better hardware and software to accompany that vision.
FSD hard and software has just to be good enough for the job.
And still we cause so many deaths because we are tired, distracted or emotional when driving.
But…it’s not.
Based on? Have you seen the progress in users YouTube videos?
It’s not there yet but I don’t see how it can’t work with vision only. It just has to be safer than human drivers.
The fact that both systems are vision only, as I said previously.
Even better, I used it myself. For 3 months. It’s awful.