Last December, a Spanish judge authorized LaLiga to block Cloudflare’s shared IP addresses to combat piracy. Thousands of innocent internet users were affected, prompting Cloudflare and cybersecurity group RootedCon to ask the court to overturn the order. A judge has now denied both requests, stating that no evidence was presented to show that blocking caused any damage.

  • @moody@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75 days ago

    This is about their right to block a range of IP addresses. I don’t think they’re suing for damages.

    • Ghoelian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 days ago

      Yes but AFAIK they have that right because they argued they were losing a lot of money to pirates.

      • @sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 days ago

        Imagine having the audacity to claim that you’re losing money to pirates and thus were justified in blocking Cloudflare IPs, and then claiming that there were no damages done to Cloudflare et al by your actions. The only way this makes sense is it Cloudflare is the only method by which people access pirate streams. What the actual fuck.

        • Ghoelian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 days ago

          Yeah it doesn’t make any sense. They’re just blocking pretty big parts of the internet all at once, of which most was probably not even illegal content to begin with, and might have been actual legitimate businesses that are now blocked from selling anything online there.