Is it only ornamental? And why are they usually webbed feet (or at least they are in my experience)?

  • @GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    3411 days ago

    I agree with all of this except the part about making things pretty being a waste. Beauty has its own value, although far too often for pieces like this it was more for bragging rights as you said.

    • @slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Also plenty of craftsmen make beautiful shit without being rich. Bragging rights is a weird way to say creative effort in that sense.

      • @GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        311 days ago

        Kind of my point, but a set of a dozen chairs like that isn’t so much about creativity as it is cost. Still beautiful imo, although i still prefer more minimalist styles in furniture.

          • Captain Aggravated
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 days ago

            Yeah, see: when you’re looking at these highly ornate antiques, it’s not the wealth of the craftsman on display; it’s the wealth of his customer.

                • I hear ya. There’s a line somewhere when people become shitty rich. I’m just not sure that line is at … has a nice dining room table with carved feet or some shit. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                  • Captain Aggravated
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    010 days ago

                    Let me clarify this part of my thinking: That line has moved a lot since the lifetime of Thomas Chippendale.

                    When you think about what it would take to build an ornately carved mahogany highboy with a high gloss varnish in 1750 versus today, including logging, transporting exotic wood around the planet, the actual woodworking…hell, just compare applying a shellac french polish versus spray lacquer today.