• FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you want something European, I’d throw AirVPN in the mix. I went there and never to Mullvad. And now I’m glad I didn’t and at the same time I’m looking forward to hearing inevitably what corpses my current provider has in the cupboard.

      I dislike Proton, which I quit after the CEO praised 47 on his big tech regulation and before they handed the email account of some environmental activist over to the authorities, in France IIRC. They want to be your replacement for Google and keep pushing more services at obscure subscription levels at you. In terms of VPN, they were good though.

      • Eggman@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        But the handing over data from a email account is not a choice for them its a legal requirement.

    • Mike Wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Hated One has a video explaining his take on what Mullvad has done, and he gives 2 good alternatives to Mullvad. He also has other videos comparing VPN services in terms of privacy. He’s very thorough.

        • eleijeep@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          https://nym.com/

          https://safing.io/spn/

          https://www.ivpn.net/en/

          https://torproject.org/

          I would be wary of the claims of any company implementing a mixnet as part of their VPN. The anonymity that Tor provides depends on the basic principle that is is unlikely that your exit node and entry node will be able to collaborate. If all nodes in the network are run by one company then that basic assumption is broken from the start.

          • eremophila@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Thank you Safing I have not heard of. ivpn not great for southern hemisphere (but do appear ethical) Tor I haven’t looked into for a long time I looked into nym not long ago and left myself this note ‘Pricey if doing per month, not if doing for year. Lack of transparency, shit website. Dodgy feel.’

          • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            If all nodes in the network are run by one company then that basic assumption is broken from the start.

            That just degrades it to a normal VPN. Allowing others to join the mixnet, gives it a path to more decentralization. But these things have to start somewhere

      • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Love that guy, but that’s the only source I have which at least feels objective, but one source, especially a YouTube video, isn’t enough. Someone got like scientific/investigative data on this?

    • whatiswrongwithyou@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There isn’t one with feature or operations parity and a similar history of success.

      If you are actually concerned for your safety or legal status or something then I wouldn’t switch from them.

      If you’re trying to accomplish something else there are good alternatives. Air for example is a great piracy vpn but I wouldn’t trust it for my own safety.

      • Mok98@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They had a similiar episode as far as I remember, don’t have a link right now tho