• @jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    732 years ago

    I’m shocked! Who could’ve seen this coming?? /s

    But seriously, the world is fucking boiling right now and these people can’t agree to some standards?

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      582 years ago

      The old men who run the world don’t care because they’ll be dead soon anyway.

      • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Normal old people still care, because they care about the world and the people they love, whether or not they’re still around. Sociopathic corporate and political leaders, however, don’t care. The issue is not so much the age as the pathological selfishness that got them into those positions in the first place.

        • @markr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          Plus they understand that they will be safe while the peasants go through the polycrisis’ genocide .

          • @krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            122 years ago

            People who think they’ll be safe while everyone else suffers are just as deluded as those who think there is no climate crisis.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              English
              82 years ago

              I read an article a while back about tech bros talking about surviving after “the big event” and they couldn’t figure out how to stop their security forces from rebelling and not kowtowing to some wimpy tech bro after society collapses. They came up with ideas like restricting food access and, I’m not joking, exploding collars. These people are idiots.

        • @const_void@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Yep, age doesn’t matter here. Just look at Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos. They’re young-ish and have no problem with watching the world burn.

      • @designated_fridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        Pff, this has to do with people caring more about their polling numbers than the environment.

        Actually saving the environment requires some hard sacrifices and it’s hard to be the elected leader who tells their voters that they’re going to pay more and get less.

        But in non-democratic countries you’re right of course.

    • Evil_Shrubbery
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      People that would lose a tiny margin of their profits would absolutely let the world burn instead, along with all biodiversity.

      So, water & food related mass migrations war, here we come!

  • @Chup@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    Some paragraphs for tl;dr:

    The discussions with China, Saudi Arabia, and on climate issues with Russia had been “complicated”, he added.

    Major oil producers fear the impact of drastic mitigation on their economies, and Russia and Saudi Arabia were blamed for the lack of progress in Goa.

    Reports of Saudi and Chinese resistance, he added, “fly in the face of their claims of defending the interests of developing countries”.

    • Spzi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Let’s fix that with carbon pricing: tax & dividend, applies to emissions but also captured atmospheric carbon, stored underground.

      So every participant in the carbon marked pays for what they emit.

      The revenue can be split among:

      • Funding removal
      • Distribute per capita to make the tax progressive
      • Fund things like renewables

      This could

      • make it profitable to run efficient carbon removal
      • net pay people who manage to live a low-footprint life

      It always would

      • create incentives for everyone involved (private people, investors, corporations, research) to make decisions which reduce emissions, if only to save / earn money.

      Price point: Take the current average price for removing one unit of greenhouse gas. Emitting one unit costs that much, increased by a factor (to fund more than just removal, or to achieve negative emissions).

  • @BackupRainDancer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If only these poor oil producers had some sort of half century or more lead to reap the benefits of their export advantage and diversify their interests. Won’t someone think of how unfair it is to ask them to change? /s

  • blazera
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    alright, John Kerry was part of this failure, and with his failure, also his appointer, Biden. He cant be allowed to continue to throw us further into a blazing hellscape

    • @Erk@cdda.social
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I’m sure there will be accountability aaaaaaaaany minute now. For any of the people that got us here. Aaaany minute. Yep.