cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/3376057

I held off on Windows 10 for as long as I could until my job required it. Now this nonsense. I hope this isn’t the start of them joining on the web DRM bandwagon.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    3 years ago

    “Whoa there!”

    Go fuck yourself with that fellow kids corporate speak. That pisses me off so much, way more than it probably should.

  • frippa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    3 years ago

    Fuck Adobe, not supporting Linux, and now not even supporting Firefox, the once most used browser? Whoever pirates their crappy software deserves a statue.

          • wvstolzing@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            3 years ago

            The pdf standard is open, though criminally bloated. Their pdf software (‘pro’ as well as the freemium ‘reader’ which looks like adware nowadays) is used only because it’s the most lenient with respect to files barely complying with the ‘standard’ – which includes things like application forms from government agencies.

            … that is, if they can be said to ‘own’ the pdf format, it’s only because they smeared it all over with their shit. A bit like how hippos mark their territory, I guess.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 years ago

                Yup, I know Okular (KDE’s PDF tool) at least works. I don’t know if it works on Windows or macOS, but I’m sure there are other tools that do.

                • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Thanks! I’ll look it up and try it out. Getting real tired of having to use shady web apps to get around something I have to do regularly as part of my job but for some unfathomable reason isn’t a default app on every computer where I work.

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    3 years ago

    Any software company that uses monthly subscriptions as their business model can fuck right off. Let us own what we buy.

    • EonNShadow@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 years ago

      Unfortunately they’re still a default app in the business world. Basically everyone at least uses Reader if only because it’s what people expect when they open a PDF.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is the main issue with that web DRM “security” shit that Google is trying to push. They have such a great market share now that big websites can now afford to put a check “only for Chrome” losing a very small percentage of users

    • CuriousGoo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      This very small percentage of users anyway would be privy to alternative to Adobe’s stack ?

      Concern will perhaps be mainly for getting new users on FF/other browsers from Chromium.

  • finder@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 years ago

    Are we surprised that Adobe is doing this? Adobe is exactly who I would’ve suspected adapting this bullshit immediately.

    • Matengor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      I tried Gimp for a longer time, too, but I could not get used to the complicated layer management, missing layer effects & layer adjustment features. I will try out Affinity.

      • Sparrow@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        It took me a ridiculously long time to switch to GIMP and If I wasn’t all in for FOSS I wouldn’t have done it. I really can’t imagine any of the designers I know using it full time.

    • Efwis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Huge learning curve and a lot of missing features.

      I have found most of the “high learning curve” is based more on work flow. Muscle memory can screw with you when trying to learn a new piece of software. I used to use Dreamweaver back in the day when I was on winblows, made the switch to Linux started using bluefish and had to change my work flow which was hard to learn because I was indoctrinated in the way dreamweaver worked. Actually had to relearn some aspects of web design since I had gotten used to the convenience of dreamweavers macros that were pre-installed

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Unfortunately not because it’s not a normal exe file but it’s installing as a side loaded “windows store uwp app” (I don’t know the exact term)

    • swellow the sun@lemmy.sdfeu.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s not an one-time purchase. I bought Affinity Photo for this purpose and then they released Affinity 2, and it wasn’t a free upgrade for Affinity 1 owners.

      I’m not buying Affinity 2 and buying every new release just like Parallels do. I’d rather stick with the old version or take a shot on Gimp instead.

        • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yes you can. Paying for a major upgraded version is the alternative to an evergreen subscription, but allows you to milk more usage out of your purchase if you don’t need the latest and greatest.

          Expecting a one time purchase to entitle you to updates forever is asinine.

  • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 years ago

    Are you kidding - they basically invented the problem. They were one of the first to move to the “rent your software” model way back when

  • BillTheTailor@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    There isn’t anything that Adobe charges money for that you can’t find an open source alternative.

    • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Im REALLY trying to make myself learn Affinity Photo, but I just keep falling back to PhotoPea which is like an in browser Photoshop clone

  • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 years ago

    Adobe, a company which developed nothing but just bought off 3rd party software by acquiring the actual developing company, and stitched everything together somehow, like a Frankenstein’s Creature, and finally sold it as a service.

    Thank you, but no thank you.

    Same applies for Autodesk.

  • mashbooq@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’ve refused to use Adobe for a while because of their bullshit. Their main product I care about is Lightroom, but Darktable is a perfectly fine replacement for it

    • Rambler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’m with you, but Darktable had soo many modules that overlap functions that I couldn’t get a good workflow going. Now, if we had a good foss copy of lightroom that behaved like lightroom, then I’d jump ship. But it is the bees bollocks so far in terms of usability.