I am currently self-hosting a meta search engine instance (searxng), which allows me combine searches from different engines (e.g. Google, Bing, Yahoo, etc), but also to filter out websites that I don’t want to show up.

The only website to make my blacklist so far is slant.co (useless SEO-riddled site that always comes up when I search for software comparisons). I also automatically redirect all reddit.com links to old.reddit.com.

I’m looking to expand this list. So, which websites do you blacklist? Either using software, or just mentally.

    • sprl
      link
      fedilink
      762 years ago

      I’d add Quora to that list of fuck you websites

      • meseek #2982
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The worst, hey we noticed you got a really hard to solve problem, well we got the answer right here, but we’re gonna dim it till you make an account, oh sorry that’s not really the answer thanks for the account sucker!

    • Square Singer
      link
      fedilink
      302 years ago

      It’s the worst. There’s even a browser extension to blacklist them: unpinterested.

      • livus
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        I had to get that because I got so tired of having to put minus pinterest in all my image searches.

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      I don’t explicitly block any, but I usually avoid clicking on pinterest and quora links. From experience, I never get what I’m looking for even without the annoying user interface.

    • lemonadebunny
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      What do people not like about Pinterest? I’ve actually found them very useful for finding pictures of my niche subjects

      • @shapesandstuff@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        232 years ago

        You cannot just open the image. You must log in to even see most images. Even working around this its scaled to tiny resolution. All content stolen/copied with zero credit/source but their seo outcompetes the original sources.

  • EthanolParty
    link
    fedilink
    562 years ago

    It’s tough because I almost feel like I need a whitelist at this point. 90% of the first page of Google results usually read like AI-generated fluff that doesn’t actually even answer my question. There are a handful of websites I trust now to give me real information and not just clickbait SEO nonsense.

    I’m at the point where I add “reddit” to the end of every search just to try and find something that was written by a real person. Maybe someday I can start adding “lemmy” instead.

    • @DrQuint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Seriously, 10 years ago, the best way to find any info on a video game was to go on gamefaqs, ign guides, the steam community or a dedicated wiki.

      Nowadays, it objectively still is the exact same, but google will give results for NONE OF THEM unless if you specify. There’s a truckload of those SEO garbage.

  • Ghoelian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 years ago

    codegrepper.com and all its shitty clones.

    All they do is scrape websites like stack overflow and github issues and present them in a more shitty way, and they somehow manage to get ranked pretty high.

  • PonyOfWar
    link
    fedilink
    242 years ago

    I never bothered actually creating blacklists for my browser. Mentally though, those weird websites that only rehost stack overflow replies.

  • @mat3ck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    242 years ago

    I’ve been using a Firefox extension instead that has fairly good filters by default, because I kept getting crap results when looking at technical questions (ie. landing on over-simplified examples without details instead of official documentation).

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublacklist/

    They publish some subscription lists of things blocked that you can chose from: splogs of GitHub/Stack overflow, Pinterest… And then you can add custom blocks directly from your results list (Quora…). It can be a nice point to start with to use their filter even out of the extension imo.

    • @dexahtm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I want to so bad but i end up finding answers there so often and using it for human responses i can’t. Damn You reddit.

  • @cmysmiaczxotoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    I don’t blacklist on the ip level but I do use a userscript to blacklist domains from showing up in my search results

    https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/1682-google-hit-hider-by-domain-search-filter-block-sites

    These are the domains currently blocked

    9to5google.com
    about.fb.com
    about.instagram.com
    business.instagram.com
    cnet.com
    developer.android.com
    developers.google.com
    ebay.com
    facebook.com
    facebookbrand.com
    fileproinfo.com
    gadgets.ndtv.com
    guidebooks.google.com
    help.instagram.com
    lifehacker.com
    microsoft.com
    orangefreesounds.com
    research.fb.com
    rover.ebay.com
    support.google.com
    support.ring.com
    twitter.com
    www.addictivetips.com
    www.androidauthority.com
    www.androidheadlines.com
    www.collectorsweekly.com
    www.digitaltrends.com
    www.howtogeek.com
    www.instagram.com
    www.lifewire.com
    www.quora.com
    www.storyblocks.com
    www.theverge.com
    
  • N-E-N
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    I’ve never considered black listing a site before tbh. Do you guys find it worth the effort when you could just, not click on the links?

    • Nom Nom Nom
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Not op, but I have been doing this for years with a userscript. Getting rid of SEO garbage, pintrest, quora, etc links makes more room for the helpful results.

      It is also a good way to ensure you don’t land on any recipe sites that are built more for wasting your time than helping you cook.

      I just got into the habit of permabanning any site that had anti-user patterns, annoying popups, right click/back button blocking, or clickbait headlines. I don’t see a lot of that stuff anymore. Makes the net a bit more useful. Or at least less frustrating.

  • ArgentCorvid [Iowa]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    *://picclick.com/*

    Just reposts old ebay listings as far as I can tell. I guess it could come in handy if you want some historical price data or something, but it mostly just craps up the search results.

  • Fleppensteyn
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    I’d be happy if there is a way to block webshops. You can block e.g. Amazon but then there will be another shop in its place.

    I wasn’t so happy with Searx but I think I’ll have a look at SearXNG if blocking is an option

    • @mim@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      In SearXNG you can redirect, or block domains (but you still need to define them). You need to enable the “Hostname replace” pluging in the setting.yaml

      enabled_plugins:
        - 'Hostname replace'  # see hostname_replace configuration below
      

      And then define the rules like this:

      hostname_replace:
      #   My redirects
        '(.*\.)?reddit\.com$': 'old.reddit.com'
      #   My filters
        'slant\.co': false
        'dailymail\.co\.uk': false
      
    • @Ducks@ducks.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I’ll second this. Learned this a long time ago. Anything you think you need on w3c schools can be found elsewhere.

    • JBloodthorn
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I’ve found that used to be more true than it is lately. I think they’re making an effort now.