• flicker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I dunno. I’m a woman and I didn’t notice the skin-tight thing until it was pointed out, but looking back at it, wouldn’t any clothes do that at 90 mph?

    ACAB but it doesn’t look horny to me. She’s just woman-shaped to me.

    • DaGeek247@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      wouldn’t any clothes do that at 90 mph?

      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Maybe, but it still managed to not look right despite that. It feels more like a failure to communicate speed with the art rather than intending horny anyways. That’s part of the problem though. The image looks horny first, and speedy second, or really even third.

      • DaGeek247@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Woah, hey, easy there. You’re starting to take this personally. Dial it back a little.

        I genuinely cannot believe that people still care about this in the year 2024.

        Nobody cares that it’s a horny image. This is the internet in 2024. The artist just managed to hit that sweet spot of genuine effort + not quite skilled enough = unintentionally hilarious. It’s bad movie night, but for comics.

        We’re all laughing at the stripper cop who the artist genuinely expected us to take seriously, not complaining that there’s clutches pearls big titty cheetah cops!

        Imagine if some of the more “notorious” disney films came out today, people would lose their minds.

        You mean like zootopia?