• ddh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      144 months ago

      You’re right, and New Zealand is our nicer, saner neighbour (Canada of the southern hemisphere)

    • @Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      You know, as an American, I’ve always felt like Australia was like even bigger Texas. Obviously, this isn’t based on any firsthand experience, just my perception based on media, stereotypes, and memes. Like I said, I’m American.

        • FundMECFS
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          Compared to the US, probably, but in general Australia is a right wing conservative place, when compared to neighbours like NZ.

          • Hanrahan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            Have you seen the Governembt NZ elected and what they’re doing to the Treaty ?

            While as an Aussie who mostly agrees Australia is a conservative ass backwards shit hole, it would appear NZ is now aspirationaly Australia.

            • FundMECFS
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              Oh yeah they are getting worse, but im not talking past 1 or two years, I’m more talking past 50 years timeframe.

          • @Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            “I love a sunburnt country, I love it a lot… it’s just a pity about all the redneck fucks!” 🎵🎹🎵

  • Fubarberry
    link
    fedilink
    English
    474 months ago

    I can understand that, as an American, Australia is near the top of the list of countries I’d consider moving to.

      • Fubarberry
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        They need two walls, one to keep Americans out and one to keep emus trapped in the middle.

      • Hanrahan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        No, we let then in, they’ve already won, they even have war bases here that Australian federal politcans are not allowed to visit.

        Personally I’d rather China took over, at least we’d get decent railways.

  • @AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    304 months ago

    It makes some sense. Australia is not that unlike the US: there’s a lot of geographical spread, people more or less speak the same language, much of it is car-centric so you won’t have to get used to walking/cycling everywhere as you might in Europe, plus there’s a more or less functioning state healthcare system and much fewer guns in the hands of the general public. On the downside, the wildlife wants to kill you, and the locals will call you a “bloody seppo bastard” (rhyming slang for American, from “septic tank”/“yank”), though sometimes affectionately.

    • Fonzie!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      That doesn’t explain why some of these countries are green.

  • @Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    104 months ago

    Guyana surprises me a little bit. The spectre of war is probably pretty unpleasant, but on the flipside that’s one of the fastest growing economies in the world. The economic situation should be, at a minimum, stable for the average person.

  • @vormadikter@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    74 months ago

    So, plus 10% would mean what? There is a 10% net-migration of the countries population towards the US… per what? Month? Decade? Minute? I wished more graphs where self-explanatory . This one isnt.

    If someone has the answer to what this is actually supposed to mean, would be cool if it got posted.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 months ago

      It is literally written, right there, in the subheading:

      Foreign Diaspora in the United States Less US Diaspora in Foreign Country, as a Share of Foreign Country Population

        • Norah (pup/it/she)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Read it again. There’s not a “per when” because it’s measuring the Diasporas, which would just be “per all time, that are still alive”

            • Norah (pup/it/she)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              144 months ago

              Yes, exactly, hence “per all time, that are still alive” because it’s measuring the current number of American-born residents of each country, compared to the residents from said country in America.

              • @woop_woop@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                As of what year?

                Edit: id also like to point out there are diaspora maps for time frames, so just posting a map with that word is as best trying to misleading or make a statement. Otherwise, that information would be freely available. That’s how data works.

                • Norah (pup/it/she)
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  74 months ago

                  That’s an entirely different thing than “per unit of time”. It’s a valid question, turns out there isn’t an answer, but some very basic searching linked me to the original map as released: http://cf.datawrapper.de/dduui/2/

                  To your edit, sure, there are diaspora maps for timeframes. Those are called immigration/emigration maps, because the acts of which grow or shrink a diaspora.

              • @underwire212@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                He’s asking a valid question. There are no time references anywhere on the chart. Surely the numbers change over time, so knowing when the map was created is perfectly relevant.