• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      181 month ago

      Exactly, capitalism ends up being just a handful of monopolies owned by the oligarchs as opposed to state owned companies owned by the public.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          71 month ago

          The part a lot of people don’t seem to understand is that capitalism is a dynamic system that evolves over time. My favorite illustration of this is the game of monopoly, everyone one starts with the exact same opportunity, and at the end all the capital will be in the hands of a single player through the mechanics of the game. That’s precisely what we see happening with capitalism in real life. Competition, which is the engine of the system, ensures that some companies win and grow, while others lose. As companies become bigger, they gain brand recognition, leverage economies of scale, and so on, making it unprofitable to try and compete with them.

        • 小莱卡
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          We had oligarch Peter Thiel express this publicly too in a recent speech, “competition is for losers, our goals are monopolies”.

  • @eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    someone needs to make a hybrid of stalin and chad like the xi/chad meme. lol

  • Sabre363
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -141 month ago

    Didn’t Stalin murder a couple of people in the name of communism, maybe not the best image to associate with

    • 小莱卡
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 month ago

      counterpoint: everyone should read writings from every historical world leader, you will be in for a surprise. You’ll find out that mainstream respected world leaders churchill and Teddy R almost echo hitler on their writings.

      • @Terminal_ERROR@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 month ago

        I’m not saying that those people are great, don’t pretend Stalin, the man that destroyed any hope of a effective socialist democracy, as a good person.

        • Cowbee [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          101 month ago

          Regardless of one’s view on Stalin, I don’t think it’s accurate to say he destroyed democracy within the Soviet Union. The Soviets, both during Stalin and after Stalin (and before) had a form of democracy called “Soviet Democracy.” It was focused on electing delegates to serve at higher councils, called “Soviets.” See this graphic for how it functioned:

          Also read Soviet Democracy by Pat Sloan if you are further interested.

        • 小莱卡
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          The early USSR policies built strong socialists foundations, without a highly developed industry to produce material wealth there is no possibility of a socialist future, only of an abundance of povery.

          This “destroyed any hope of a socialist democracy” comes from the mislead idealists that wanted the “war communism” implemented during the civil war to continue, which would’ve lead to a catastrophe of gargantuan proportions a couple of decades later with the invasion of Nazi Germany.