MicroWave@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoMan gropes Mexico president as she speaks with citizens on the streetswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square134linkfedilinkarrow-up1525arrow-down16
arrow-up1519arrow-down1external-linkMan gropes Mexico president as she speaks with citizens on the streetswww.theguardian.comMicroWave@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square134linkfedilink
minus-squareGraveyardOrbit@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down10·3 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareScubus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-23 months agoNot who you responded to, but evidently someone needs to point out that you didnt read their question, or you maliciously misinterpreted it. Edit: nope they did actually answer the question, im just shockingly bad at reading which is very unusual for me.
minus-squareGraveyardOrbit@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months agoIt appears that you’re the one who didn’t read my response. “Not all men are sex offenders but almost every sex offender is a man”
minus-squareScubus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·3 months ago…so you’re just ignoring their question to substitute your own. Very nice strawman, but it does appear pretty malicious at this point.
minus-squareGraveyardOrbit@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoQuestion posed: “So all men are sex offenders” Answer given: “Not all men are sex offenders but almost every sex offender is a man” It’s a literal direct answer to their question. Perhaps English isn’t your native language?
minus-squareScubus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoNah m8, you right. Somehow repeatedly missed your last statement. Sorry for the snarkiness. I saw the “almost every sex offender is a man” part, but i missed you actually answering the question somehow. Genuinely sorry Edit:seriously thats wild, im guessing i got hit with a serious case of assuming
deleted by creator
Not who you responded to, but evidently someone needs to point out that you didnt read their question, or you maliciously misinterpreted it.Edit: nope they did actually answer the question, im just shockingly bad at reading which is very unusual for me.
It appears that you’re the one who didn’t read my response. “Not all men are sex offenders but almost every sex offender is a man”
…so you’re just ignoring their question to substitute your own. Very nice strawman, but it does appear pretty malicious at this point.
Question posed: “So all men are sex offenders” Answer given: “Not all men are sex offenders but almost every sex offender is a man”
It’s a literal direct answer to their question. Perhaps English isn’t your native language?
Nah m8, you right. Somehow repeatedly missed your last statement. Sorry for the snarkiness.
I saw the “almost every sex offender is a man” part, but i missed you actually answering the question somehow. Genuinely sorry
Edit:seriously thats wild, im guessing i got hit with a serious case of assuming