I feel that people will misunderstood me here, but I wanted to ask this question.
Why did no company employ basically 70%-90% trainees, people with disabilities and desperate people and outsource the work that cannot be finished cheaply?
Is there is a company like that, but I just don’t know it?
You’re just describing capitalism.
There are places that do. Animal farms is one kind of place.
There is a cafe called Brownies and Downies that hire disabled people.
I think this was mostly answered in the other comments, so I’ll mention another category of people: felons although perhaps they fall in to the desperate people category because many employers do simple background checks on people and purposefully avoid hiring felons, thus the job prospects of felons is limited.
Why don’t companies hire them? I assume due to perception from that company’s customers, current/potential employees who wouldn’t want to work with felons, and associated risks (depending on the nature of the crime and the business of course).
I know of a company that specifically advertises that they hire felons and that they’re absecind chance employer to help people get their life back together. As far as I understand it’s mostly manual labor and factory type work and I assume they pay less than their competitors, so would have less operating costs. If this is the case, wouldn’t more businesses want to do so?
It may not be overall beneficial. They may attract some customers as they advertise how they’re helping people and by using their services, you’re helping people get their life on track, but they may also lose some customers. For some positions, hiring can be difficult for any company and this may make filling those positions even more difficult/costly such that savings aren’t worth it.
Generally if there’s an easy way to make money/more profit, it would be prevalent, so there’s probably down sides (thst are not necessarily apparent) that out weigh the benefits or people are not trying to maximize profit for some reason (possibly due to bias resulting in incorrect assessments).
When companies try to use the cheapest possible labor, it usually results in a decrease in productivity and quality, which causes them to lose business to competitors in a healthy, competitive market.
If a company can find cheaper labor that performs just as well, they’ll do so and outperform the competition. If they can find a way to distort a market so competitive pressure has less impact, then they’ll do that absent a sufficient threat of punishment.
You see this cycle a lot in IT with off shoring.
“We can hire 10 Indians for the price of one of you,” is something I’ve had a CIO tell me. He didn’t appreciate my coworker saying, “No you can’t. If you could, you already would.”
I had someone tell me in almost the same breath that I had written the cleanest code he had ever seen, and that he could hire someone with a PhD from India for a fraction of my rate. I told him to do it if he thought that would get him better results. He didn’t.
